[TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 29 March 2018 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BF012DB70; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates@ietf.org, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, tls-chairs@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, tls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.76.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152234467968.9235.9174633781764877934.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:31:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Z77bA2Gcn_q2TfRUEs9sDjLt4As>
Subject: [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:31:20 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Section 18: "However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to publication, the Designated Experts may approve registration once they are satisfied that such a specification will be published." This sounds like it's simply the early allocation process (rfc7120). Maybe it's useful to name it like this to avoid confusion. 2) Also section 18: "IANA [...] SHOULD direct all requests for registration to the review mailing list." Why is this not a MUST?
- [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-iet… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Sean Turner