[TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 29 March 2018 17:49 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-record-limit@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, tls-chairs@ietf.org, sean@sn3rd.com, tls@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152234574960.9148.17418629394530547618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:49:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/dpkHTbLMzza48NIy8XMWILi9KKY>
Subject: [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-record-limit/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the well written doc!

One minor comment the title of sec 5: not sure if "deprecating" is the best
word as that maybe be read as "moved to historic" in IETF world...

Tiny typo in sec 5:
s/and "max_fragment_length"/an "max_fragment_length"/

[TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-iet… Mirja Kühlewind
Re: [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Martin Thomson