IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 13 April 2017 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20507131842 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 02:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AaRMBKSs081O for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 02:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1468B13182A for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 75so26265756lfs.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ohJUUXGgF7ArIlkyEXDg9U/RTf0EDdQKGROtejDG6io=; b=FQZ4SVxdJ1BBuCI23BL1DOTQ0D1LBDm5vFcWfxyP/gTGIBeQLYepmx8SBJ1poKuCvj p7dvONQ6lCyjX1bTq3WmPrJSjccEA8ECANbuzLmG4ZJR1yyzobFw1e8mWlfghPS8N3ym 00lQOv4CC/lmMjuJBAVwRcCfGsnAw9qJykek0RPm6IW8nP25uDKLiQqmQU+AavQfd0AR aUo+qVcIqDCyNGvz/9KNQsw1u743hkjXISSaq6JxDMgZK9FINO0zYtCJDqY0A3JBsFiF Y/v72WJmoRKKV26GM5FLGPA237oot3otht7xGSqmpsHqIUBT9DOggNSy18FD5FyurK/d bkEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ohJUUXGgF7ArIlkyEXDg9U/RTf0EDdQKGROtejDG6io=; b=CMt+ntDj7osWWQtQ6Vc5We672NNJ4XfoNeMqJRroCy0hzerqz+wvclLN8fX1Y65qDt d1Eo/MKdAcUIToPFXRcCGRww85D9ldHQo6rxWk7c6xRL0IscClkmMX3oNqygKz0NRFFG 9yuTYBej0Vi+txTHC+rExGOgkMizt+5VvHhonRVV/RSzjsVrmmgY1JNNyNBmaZw6t677 stfOuDunMG8MgKzPIwXA4h824IhRrQtDCH/P0itvxSHAGcA5RPruF4OzeXPLnhNlN2bJ oWKH7vAGKGAbxLn0fkyC2/1L/TsNc+nkpyYhhV0qbH3d/tq7iLdwbHOsFxy1HysOtaLO c2Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7+rPmWHcObetTMEzhptR+xvGLy/JR3adQQu8jaTEvrgZOfe4b5 +fHtUW9BgctlK6zdmcbtNXiwMk41RLjF
X-Received: by 10.46.75.2 with SMTP id y2mr581069lja.103.1492073665393; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.83.5 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.46.83.5 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F7262846-0E93-4780-B051-8DB1253ADCE5@sn3rd.com>
References: <F7262846-0E93-4780-B051-8DB1253ADCE5@sn3rd.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:54:24 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVV8j+-E4oN4OdXn9vC2p2yKSS-cg2NWZPd2A_xwf67rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045ea6e8ce117a054d08788f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/a_BUVsolUIJdu04BmmDg807uHfo>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:01:10 -0000

I have reviewed the changes. They look good.  I have some reservations
about section 7 (implementation status) given that I expect it to date
badly, but it isn't really doing any actual harm either.

On 11 Apr. 2017 11:09 pm, "Sean Turner" <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we
> agree with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the WG should review
> the changes before we ask Kathleen (our newly appointed AD) to continue
> progressing the draft.  Please review the differences from the -12 version
> that went through WGLC and the latest version [0] and let us know by
> 20170426 whether there is anything that would stop progression of the draft.
>
> Thanks,
>
> J&S
>
> [0] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-
> rfc4492bis-12&url2=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-16
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email