Re: [TLS] Draft TLS Extension for Path Validation

[Robert Moskowitz <[e-mail]>]

Peter,

SCVP *IS* being used in aviation applications today in ground-to-ground 
cases.  But the comm cost for air-to-ground is excessive.  So this is 
directly what at least US FAA and EU EUROCONTROL are implementing.

Aviation, through ICAO, is building their own PKI.  The CP is in final 
drafting and a number of CA companies have signed on.  Testbed testing 
for various applications are in progress.  I just got off a video call 
for a PoC planning session that will cover activities through the end of 
the year.

Aviation is finally going digital.

Ashley is working on the use case draft which will point to a slide deck 
as well that shows the use case.

So this is important in one community:  Civil Aviation.

Bob

On 5/26/22 04:46, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> An indirect question on the overall premise here: Given that SCVP is
> essentially nonexistent (unless there's some niche market somewhere using it
> that I'm not aware of, which is why I didn't use an unqualified
> "nonexistent"), does it really matter much?  If an RFC falls in the forest and
> all that...
>
> Peter.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls