[TLS] Reminders

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6587C12D1E6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbHC11FZqIjz for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A75C112D0C9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p74so59201912qka.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=tfjuR/feKxktsLYNPIYBCdt2lN+UqqvutfZBDg4uB1w=; b=fbjf2VUz89eOz4BKFJFYj8YdIthM5PTrFuJJ49Qverde/XyzYrq6EloJFM4VKRJog/ A+nOJqpIGCc27gKc0FH68spbvyY7xI0joLqlyUjijbyILiayMp+4jOCOuVW0Vw1PIeLx 3AOfO8OUad24lLU8p4Dlgep+oFWuqA6FyamnE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=tfjuR/feKxktsLYNPIYBCdt2lN+UqqvutfZBDg4uB1w=; b=A67hDEmBu1Deq8LomiEOe/cZioZ6PiVNecZF2liQmE9HQ/nFBxMt2wiaFUUUZIhEMJ npBcgbChUk1Sy8JpPjy6JU2vtGUJStnb4LpnOzupX3jsxuhT3CBvFmCn/RPiQQXeJx8s IxMjK1ctCsHjNJR7+f0oNdihyOZFpB+rYCMSJC2T2FsxzYhmsRI2Zr8GUfbvXSweNLHU v3NpxolFaM3cHz9iNSonFf/yfhAP9+RctWtEfRaNA9jlsPrsjB/OkoozaFNZfrZVKIA+ GYy3sk4gi6LKO0eoS857h4/fc1Bym+lXG6ahdA2zVjbQuBVI5ydHotB2sWAVHY+c+5rb udEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJnOkeNn38/staACa89sNZU5BoEKu/+P+n7TiX4JIPo+WciMYbg+M+KWaPEBF8KDA==
X-Received: by 10.55.203.156 with SMTP id u28mr26370957qkl.116.1468247243556; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.112] ([96.231.230.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q5sm2118239qkd.2.2016.07.11.07.27.22 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <47E3268E-46F0-4308-88EA-250042EF2B80@sn3rd.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:27:21 -0400
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/eHCVulDXL12Oq0sMISKFhXhmbrs>
Subject: [TLS] Reminders
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:27:27 -0000

Hi,

Just wanted to remind everybody that we’ve got two non-TLS1.3 items we’re looking for WG input on:

- Before 12 July, we’d like to know your thoughts about progressing draft-ietf-tls-pwd (Watson and ekr responded):
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/WrNa7PXTZn2ZhfmoQDA_pnUVuN4

- Before 14 July, we’d like to know your thoughts on the proposed AUTH48 proposed changes (nobody has commented on this):
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aBvqMG7t8qkO5rPt-xaMHipuBVk

spt