Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-cross-sni-resumption

[Michael StJohns <[e-mail]>]

On 7/19/2021 10:16 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I support publication.
>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-cross-sni-resumption/
>   
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls



Nit - which also applies to draft-ietf-tls-flags:  In the IANA 
considerations section, the Value field is expressed as 0x8 - a hex 
value - rather than 8 a decimal value.  Given that the registry uses 
decimal bit number positions, and that a hex value might be confused 
with a mask (e.g. 0x8 might be confused with bit 5), I'd suggest 
dropping the "0x".   Or, to keep this more in keeping with normal 
practice, specify Value as "TBD" and have the IANA do the actual 
assignment consistent with policy - it's a good way to ensure the WG and 
the IANA are on the same page.  If that change is made, add a "to be 
removed before publication" note to the IANA indicating that you want 
the assignment to be made out of the 8-31 range.  Section 3 would also 
need to change to remove "(8)";

Nit: Section 4 - it's not clear that "Section 4.6.1" refers to RFC8846 
(at least in the text version) as opposed to a mis-numbered section - 
instead I suggest: "Section 4.6.1 of that document"

Mike