IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 28 March 2021 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876A73A103C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=oFI4X7Sy; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=OkyzwAlM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ewkv5q1CZ6Ub for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A8C3A1001 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6F55C0078 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm2; bh=Cm7exXqPEnKG9jOURJKijcY1aGc6ROQQ12H5HWFWNQc=; b=oFI4X7Sy IARuGS3ifF3xE7KN+ASnIXI6hCatRpQx9sAKa25YwVy+PjkwGD8ccdxrfYR8m4+W LfQXJ4QCSRjxGe0fRHm6uZhIefyx70kFOO76IQZ2IvmCGlLUBt+WGWdfw24aC+Tr xNhC9INzH6QCTEcP1S1mkyAVuk1FunLg+5MZ/m6d6sRBbogt+rIDmLn1sNQ+ayrL UMRwhHJ0PIQbgudoX2Jf17gCHFh+gw5gFDHJ0y5l32DZpnaRjCyOXG+U+mogKVmj NB9iQwQqqtAXzu5zSSC1iUoFKeEFlCaEJR+FDApf8laA1gAqsmxxo/CYKhjz8SBI 8wp9NoiwzaPcgA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Cm7exXqPEnKG9jOURJKijcY1aGc6R OQQ12H5HWFWNQc=; b=OkyzwAlM43MsXL+qVtwrt5MgBiIN6QBcGrUtUn/mJeGSs Wz8SAdt93AqtkqXhF1xlOiV2whsOALFh2KXLnKaoNjuZMV+Ws5LJ7H77TGPiwRLx BshocNlQ5ZoEdG9XZGab1Hj0OO5nf2VeD94HeoNwrDR5SaUf0GlgF1nSJc360QXU i2BXdATcJEQd2vK3q3V8ZTDYF9OgSdxkPQb3WWMGfSUbxSreFRR2e7j3d0tktO9F A2Ao2XXfcanwoRBhRXgQrKN2EEQ/wvudOzygYQtGBGf4PTb7FYTF3WCAncI9OH+l XYUFL+kn+bI25HFCtWJel1HUebGGMwqHF4klIJatw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:XjNgYE6hUyNxp9uH_opwcp42_WYELDAZlU9YsNYrhO7bfKO2MICybg> <xme:XjNgYF7eZc1yMSyuNS5_KIi8VNHMA1FkvJJF_hRBMxMquFSp6lC8yyOjCsCKa7nGk scpkc5Yq2MTGvOvDQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehhedguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeehvddrudeijedrudeivd drjeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:XjNgYDd6MHTvqgRiZgYFVRiEb3K07dJDaJ6kFCwPS4k6wCVAvaimVg> <xmx:XjNgYJLfCKiCvOsOFGQDZ5HS7LOKUUz68vfAkOnitFNBtgn3m9pQdg> <xmx:XjNgYIIhgHfssqRx_fhN34RgX82KP_dwp_IM1TSZO5unDEn0jm8jlg> <xmx:XjNgYCiLcUWpzZHKN6VxKfQPFYeK7Yz-UIhnI89rF3620qDdWPiL2Q>
Received: from fv-az186-764.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.167.162.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4D25924005A for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0703342724051186550=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210328074222.4D25924005A@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/g0S63X2gWyiTU8T2999XHVDAOlA>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 07:42:35 -0000



Issues
------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+3/-2/💬32)
  3 issues created:
  - Server enforcement of ClientHelloInner invariants (by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/406 
  - public_name edge cases and client checks (by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/405 
  - [Question] Is there any public-facing setups that currently support ECH? (by cujof)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/404 

  10 issues received 32 new comments:
  - #406 Server enforcement of ClientHelloInner invariants (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/406 
  - #404 [Question] Is there any public-facing setups that currently support ECH? (4 by TheDGOfficial, cujof, sftcd)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/404 
  - #403 public_name and maximum_name_length could be smaller (1 by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/403 
  - #402 Not all of CHOuter is authenticated (3 by chris-wood, cjpatton, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/402 
  - #401 ECH complexity (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/401 
  - #400 Hard to imagine ECH handling in constant time - ponder and document? (6 by chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben, sftcd)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/400 
  - #398 Is the outer compression really worthwhile? (3 by chris-wood, cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/398 
  - #397 Including the client's ephemeral public key in the AAD precludes use of a single-shot HPKE API (3 by chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/397 
  - #396 A MUST for inclusion of public_name in outer SNI seems wrong (9 by chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben, sftcd)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/396 
  - #395 (Editorial) Add some more structure to "Offering ECH" (1 by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/395 

  2 issues closed:
  - Consider a shorter config ID length https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/379 
  - [Question] Is there any public-facing setups that currently support ECH? https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/404 



Pull requests
-------------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+1/-0/💬0)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Define HelloRetryRequestInner/Outer messages (by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/407 

* tlswg/dtls13-spec (+1/-0/💬0)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Error -> fatal (by ekr)
    https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/pull/219 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
* https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts
* https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls
* https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email