IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: The TLS WG has placed draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com> Tue, 01 April 2025 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <neried7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADB115DD7C6; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 08:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0OSr6zjSIFbG; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 08:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83EE715DD7BF; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 08:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e5e0caa151so10749504a12.0; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 08:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743521553; x=1744126353; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rKH6nB2G3UK/a9ngE4ipRx8CyEkjw4IFMJ2W2x7crao=; b=B6LoETrLviVL3/1fwuaHOkXSuC1NNkElb60wXT+F1lILGS8SAMeXK8UfzhZBM09Pm4 0/mbZTXFLnJj3QYRVSrgTFhhQenSSnNCBbvkYqF61q7TrDN6v2hjCE//W+m+a9NbZAyH ttt7g9di0qDzab223gkR/78febvDg/k03TiGmz/FRl0w5rbeWEJ07g6mfYGXqpdHU6OX ps0UDefl0Ef+8w/B05B5Q0MajQCSdFtHdsNIAXx+tgy8AVuUz4ABSWrwN3EEhGzCU/Iw 9AJcdVTkfW2NKFdNrk8Nelb9ZE+4+v5G0zf97hMquLnS53I7AXQKjKRMF+vW1aoerA5b 85jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743521553; x=1744126353; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rKH6nB2G3UK/a9ngE4ipRx8CyEkjw4IFMJ2W2x7crao=; b=okbVy8v+9Hh9Xmh7DBlFjx9In2Y356XsnfZZwC/vdvtv4Kj+P2P9g85VUOPSperGFM Cn5oj/ct1Xk7Df5qP9iVpdfU8R9FLKAAfu9IiyfQRIZqt5bI8ChlwXQf9TWPTlL+ibk/ LZIqMaSTnU5PSYWpOFy3tThZDFw7xSPERc1UUJTaTO2IysqfaX7NMDHsEKi8TYtxPS8J vSMDdf+NjkRTGHShNyv/Px2ozRl0PNjsLDc4uPrreJorDKojvw9HPSQy4rrgq7o7VBBc VuhSPSVG22HSW/3WPSPRKvke/wkcCXgcWnaWykiMa+GhtcQMjAw90+r/4GXF4QcOjQKS HUFw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVjRxRGatDCBIBFO/hzEYKROLUXOD0MwTxk9ffL8BKUNM8X6m7hQJEX1z6O4qjhk24+ja7g6wGeXHVqZJKon8gQjvNx/wOiuMxAkNRaie/+nhbV/gl22A==@ietf.org, AJvYcCW1rkGdFX8AsmvJhKXtmMNDXIZLEy1lHpbPR/DoY5Uit2Sti8uzUju8T1askIzDn9RkIB3g@ietf.org, AJvYcCWC3UWzX4elqdAlJjjl1Gwbekyj18A40t4r1tZOjKPE2mNRIgpIfXFLgpAHZ2aOsB6QHhbbQbnaeoFGyQ==@ietf.org, AJvYcCWGmMxu6YC+o6cl1hZokWowklGBWO5kfljlmibKDNF8b4oYRmFctpBRDVY9Tk/X901X3FwX/tTeaWnf2o4KLqisX1yRTlXXrw==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDR3gvyP75XfltJSNgqXPT4D7KNH7GZ647HjnZKzWLf3iRqSz+ JZ971kV9C3hdacWq7pmUfTc6CBtJ/XQCYv7pTbHjlMHjTAzPM2H/AADL2RANpgRTUHDQ/crFhCc Hwek02TapVHuv/DE1SiRj8y9vVzInNwuB
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncugUlSRQd+G+vneR/imyn/E85anoReTjhr90y7FP5LKOtYPY+tzONxxBF0HNV6 Iiv7q9tZs5/X9IErXc9yz2yiO9/a4NfDr5JO+QG9h4MSJinRkI4beyePI8XSIo/Xb/F8OLMUnMN /8dsx4ACg8Lm+pUWhDKTNm8/1S4wnomneKRGnibWdwOUBiZl8jb1UVgmPOr3IqxIxMTIHhxA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFBdGB/pWJqAkSGgQew1B+vgCBaHykGBDUYzk1bVXyrGQd/rWVQ5lQf2XvS5BJB5enbr52iPJPPzgcsQGkFchw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:84e:b0:5e7:b02b:381f with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5edfdd16af6mr10535836a12.30.1743521552710; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 08:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <174351230138.2442419.6534148375330223110@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z> <4b0291bf-d2f5-4ac4-9fbe-55ba47875e17@cs.tcd.ie> <715b57623392284c16bf07e038e1dcd482cdc306.camel@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: <715b57623392284c16bf07e038e1dcd482cdc306.camel@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
From: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:31:55 -0400
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JoOAmUi7tMEUH8nE2x1rMlEQyEUD1kUJT6ZRxweVxG9X3kNY1Zse-0CJrA
Message-ID: <CAFR824y3o7t7WeJaPiT8_ostcRioF9VvHyVMD1xSj3XV2DK1tA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bellebaum, Thomas" <thomas.bellebaum@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cec6b40631b93ecd"
Message-ID-Hash: 3YK6ST3MINWZPSS3PGD5TRSDU4CFQ7EL
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3YK6ST3MINWZPSS3PGD5TRSDU4CFQ7EL
X-MailFrom: neried7@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "tls-chairs@ietf.org" <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement@ietf.org" <draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement@ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, "ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: The TLS WG has placed draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/i7OLt0FkBULQy-ghuPaOp_oUuYM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

> A question to the authors:
> The draft talks about "users that need to be fully post-quantum".
> Can you please give a specific example of such users and their motivation?

A specific example is moving to a compute / dependency base that is
minimalist to only PQ primitives they wish to maintain, such as those that
have long update / deployment cycles, as well as those that want a
minimalist PQ interop target

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 11:18 AM Bellebaum, Thomas <
thomas.bellebaum@aisec.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

> I agree with Stephen on this one and would not support adoption of
> non-hybrids.
>
> There is no reason to not work on things like preventing key reuse at the
> ISE.
>
> A question to the authors:
> The draft talks about "users that need to be fully post-quantum".
> Can you please give a specific example of such users and their motivation?
>
> -- TBB
>

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status