Re: [TLS] DTLS 1.3

Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Fri, 08 July 2016 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D36312D124 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.506] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ds1f0xiyGM0R for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from welho-filter4.welho.com (welho-filter4.welho.com [83.102.41.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3195D12D5B9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter4.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE43422F; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:46:08 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp1.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.84]) by localhost (welho-filter4.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.26]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTyvXND6n5Bv; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:46:08 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from LK-Perkele-V2 (87-100-177-32.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.100.177.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FCDBC4; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:46:08 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 20:46:05 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: "Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <20160708174605.GA14566@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <577E4392.6060408@cs.tcd.ie> <D3A51FC1.6C049%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com> <1467967459.3009.7.camel@redhat.com> <D3A52886.6C06E%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com> <1467968753.3009.11.camel@redhat.com> <D3A52BC5.6C07C%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com> <1467971752.3009.22.camel@redhat.com> <D3A53771.6C0A5%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com> <20160708132549.GA14245@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <D3A5887A.6C22C%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D3A5887A.6C22C%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/lT8maZsIAE5cu1Hy4XcZFWezKnA>
Cc: tls <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] DTLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 17:46:13 -0000

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:25:09PM +0000, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB) wrote:
> Hi Ilari,

> My use case is an IoT device that voluntarily (or better, knowingly)
> migrates its attachment from IP to GSM-SMS and vice-versa and wants to
> keep the (painfully) negotiated session open.  Here the client is in
> complete control of the situation and can do the Id rollover at the right
> point in time.

Hmm.. GSM-SMS... Would 1 backup ID be enough for that (given that it
then would have to get another backup ID using SMS (which I presume
is pletty unpleasant) for renumbering back into IP)? Or would one
preferably have 2?



-Ilari