Re: [TLS] simplistic renego protection

Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> Fri, 20 November 2009 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD8C3A6807 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:57:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.074
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.074 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id enNXGvXhES+L for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpde01.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8357A3A67A5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sap.corp by smtpde01.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id nAK4vKhZ015318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:57:20 +0100 (MET)
From: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <200911200457.nAK4vKq2015512@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
To: nelson@bolyard.me
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:57:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4B061FDD.4090605@bolyard.me> from "Nelson B Bolyard" at Nov 19, 9 08:49:33 pm
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanner: Virus Scanner virwal05
X-SAP: out
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] simplistic renego protection
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:57:28 -0000

Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> 
> Based on your respective most recent messages in this thread,
> I think you and Martin have different definitions of "lenient server".
> Please establish a common set of definitions.

I'm sorry -- my fault.

I was commenting your post (about the non-renego or renego-disabled
servers that are going to be with us for a while leaving clients
in the dark) but quoting the lenient stuff as well.

-Martin