IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Why are the brainpool curves not allowed in TLS 1.3?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744BB130E61 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLREvz5cCwQh for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36FD9130E33 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6IHcSTC000365; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:42:47 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=oG8NWHMm7kMmgdJzpIeW4lJa7EcZrVxSLxl1PI/XPaA=; b=El5HVWVTu8XZlv64Au5tlJxE3SlLjeKWIJStr6DhCa3bjF2vj0Wu7IcDko3+UTbhGf2q sPx4xz/YocC5/PaQw4sXtEHfK4A3InfmIZRR0xElcbb+5PxNDfNu0ufT3nrIW0lDB7ZV W/MRyUMtzhgB5B2rNkUCf0ZOQ/Eiw1UF68PJJcH9adVyiw4Dnrjtz2sPz7/7pj9DQvRd 0OhezBitlKyXH4irm/8kLP/Zfp5/7tMhxHcOLYUsIxQmmWmid7BxpqnWu+S6rICIgs8Q ZD01vtZ/lbCQtw1f6oKcBPnLlAJrUU21iEHsmv8X3DYp+IVRagd65tCf318OJnBjruOm fw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2k9p34ttky-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:42:47 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w6IHYiP8008587; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:42:46 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2k7cgurvqk-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:42:46 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:42:45 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:42:45 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>, "Bruckert, Leonie" <Leonie.Bruckert@secunet.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Why are the brainpool curves not allowed in TLS 1.3?
Thread-Index: AdQdyutxd5brAeCrTvCBnUE+fi65pAALHowA///OLCuAAEQ9AIABKxEAgAAnlQCAAF9LAP//x8YAgAACGoCAAABxAA==
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:42:44 +0000
Message-ID: <C32B31CB-CCDC-457B-B8CC-D61B9441BE96@akamai.com>
References: <DE8E4C1F24911E469CC24DD4819274AA2770426C@mail-essen-01.secunet.de> <CABcZeBNjsU+FLdF7nnfhaqLWDNU5HHcX-W_261wmAfWqmMqm+w@mail.gmail.com> <1531903926363.56642@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <2386527.GkuWJfRkxc@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <DE8E4C1F24911E469CC24DD4819274AA27734B81@mail-essen-01.secunet.de> <1980F0B3-65DB-48F7-B898-3389731C8125@akamai.com> <7098419E-6F96-4398-A736-38C2F99E11FF@ll.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <7098419E-6F96-4398-A736-38C2F99E11FF@ll.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.f.0.180709
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.40.146]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C32B31CBCCDC457BB8CCD61B9441BE96akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-18_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=789 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807180193
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-18_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=709 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807180193
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/qaOpfz_57gafYzbH_T_d2gAXraM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Why are the brainpool curves not allowed in TLS 1.3?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:42:51 -0000

>No offense meant, but this does not make sense. Code points were assigned, probably some apps were/are using them. Now those code points are to be invalidated, and new ones assigned instead?!



Perhaps I am confused.



Code points for pre-1.3 were assigned, and they are invalid for TLS 1.3.  Those “you should not send these for 1.3” could be re-used for TLS 1.3, if that was desired.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email