IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Ticket request PR#20

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sun, 19 April 2020 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE35D3A07BA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x0XAsgJQ-A1y for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61EBE3A07AE for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id j3so7849803ljg.8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JKtjr6jx6xdhKgFvEeP0sHGtEGd6vGwm5e1sC8HAZlQ=; b=GxQYYJgeufFRoPiZS0AOWv+WvkvqSVLiG+xBxNS0H53fIeBJ8r9uWuPEWCK9bOehR7 ijbt7JoEsz14/shXDcGwiMtZe7Qim6hQqqGcUUXrk3DkPGNfU1yiNOgBSJ+dM7C7wLoD Bvpe09+gJAsGn6KboiJfZcHLT+/6+YeSTqGoz/cWL9kZ82pkuKejZQh/epLw4AQOJu6f jFHxTIezLi9HLxTQE5qQYDEh9U+LRke9IkaviGgZBbKUoXhzCBY9KIBkuwYMmqT/UByg 9r/N94FXtcPsPnCu0GhsnGldXv3GOTMuMu2w40zzQJ2bBPxbVTG3swamPoHwk4ZdQBdw IgCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JKtjr6jx6xdhKgFvEeP0sHGtEGd6vGwm5e1sC8HAZlQ=; b=sw28HZy6hOzf0OlnE3SzO/WtO2XjpHfxTztd4DKQcJdHjhvOIIIXs5zKjUIt7viC2Q ZiN+U9rX6BengoQdOI6x7UP/GKGk8CUhdfAqbSDyTmCLsTmSwqfMcPiLvapAU4T9xr1d gcmxWuFgGR6ndw+9+SxAdD1WmbcBlrgGtUiMia2Me0iM3trFecyZNoNTAJoMAELaY9ul IRi5Pz1S0XG+A68NOB3dL33Wne5zW458Z9sC2Qw5FNjw09xvBnd5qfp8/aGN3PG9Wi5P SnLOseSOeO+4siIN6oppBQQjOY9Bwe2QPv64VVdYkdjBd7S+UVwdY9F4D8AtgnVXozsY q64g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubfSeYuBaJZnhXUGlWcG4TYk8mTm3GPwWWFujtzDSL8n+e/44WG 7LM3RAczUzbHpRkiQLZssfxnWAhlbrajrB2NYBIjv7S+kCk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLQj30IFdRn1fwCO/eCsoNLod0SUE4UcQyfy+JcVp+sZdV+Vm4tnBEPcMnbIjv9RaxhvzHudJrzv8XQ0Wi90oo=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:351a:: with SMTP id z26mr8127370ljz.162.1587336145499; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200419222318.GY41308@straasha.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200419222318.GY41308@straasha.imrryr.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:41:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPKiWw3BJtX-sU_E3Zhw3M92PVqsVZkqu1ATkLnJaJrRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001789c605a3ac7f6c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/tHFRE9dWlBHPbQjQ_5i1u9Kw5Z0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Ticket request PR#20
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 22:42:30 -0000

I don't think we should make this change. In the context of this draft, if
the client wants that behavior, it should send {1, 1}.

-Ekr


On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:23 PM Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
wrote:

> I uploaded a small pull request for the ticket request draft:
>
>     https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest/pull/20
>
> it stipulates that servers SHOULD send at least one ticket unless *both*
> counters are zero.  A client willing to accept tickets for either of the
> two handshake types is capable of accepting a ticket for the other.
>
> Yes, this leaves the door open to later define (or not) special
> semantics for the zero value to be used between mutually consenting
> clients and servers.
>
> --
>     Viktor.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email