IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] One stream to rule them all (was Re: Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 04 May 2017 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB57128C84 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 19:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_evbcgXkO61 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 19:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D9C126C3D for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 May 2017 19:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v442QSQN018692; Thu, 4 May 2017 03:29:06 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=FTQ6x+5QZl97yzHJtOo/UeuayKCnhDpZKJ8dLCn4DGw=; b=KyfASnVpT7QO8TXSemcSwnr5jUY5bd+vGNFNWbeX8vc35XTnJ7YKEhVnyD/bKAlcG3NZ FbNyEsV6VsV4hjUWgkeU95R9HLiLM/y//u6LxdGVYFp6Tv3LgkGmIza/PA+q+PKoMDgc N/dWI5C0YTZdr88hM9JAbBSwj5Jx05y8AG0RzR3fbuWlbipq0USaxVC3badwn3Gzfzmm hkvtbSfG+E6cQxrwwsnCjthrtxVt5rPcuw77KV5gj6vw/hucc5v53UjgaZIksAaMqv9c lQzDkBUhlH+6WEw8hZvbqGD25+x0dP3VGUENVSIObseO1puogE/4qG9S1f9jYn2fiGIB 1w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 ([96.6.114.86]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2a72n97k0d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 May 2017 03:29:05 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v442Qa5t004730; Wed, 3 May 2017 22:29:04 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2a72mb3d9v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 May 2017 22:29:04 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 3 May 2017 21:29:03 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 3 May 2017 21:29:03 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: One stream to rule them all (was Re: [TLS] Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT)
Thread-Index: AQHSxHbYw7JncmGtmkWF7ddamAiDoKHjZPGwgAAOTuA=
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 02:29:02 +0000
Message-ID: <5242af630cb14f29847455c2de6ceb81@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CABkgnnWseFHVLu_Qmn7AkdJVYHGdOAZfPP=Trz_3MbQV5H5Wcw@mail.gmail.com> <74c5b8f9c44149dda3b26ed833588eed@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <74c5b8f9c44149dda3b26ed833588eed@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.38.153]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-05-03_18:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1705040039
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-05-03_18:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1705040039
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/vOSxFiUhExl88CLI6HFSQ4Yc8r8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] One stream to rule them all (was Re: Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 02:29:10 -0000

 > Because doing anything else makes it a lot harder for the application.
 >
 > I realize that you *want* that, but clearly we disagree about the
 > utility of API hurdles.  Given that the application already took
 > extraordinary steps to enable 0-RTT, we don't think that adding
 > artificial hurdles is going to change things.
 
 That's kind of inflammatory.  Apology accepted :)
 
 I don't want to make things hard.  I want to make them clear and merging
 two sets of data with different security properties does not seem like it's
 helpful.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email