Re: [TLS] Review of draft-guballa-tls-terminology-03

[Melinda Shore <[e-mail]>]

I share the more broadly-stated concern that this draft
introduces terminology and architectural framings that
don't match how things work either in practice or in
existing documents.  I understand that the authors are
looking for a tool to get a better handle on the protocol,
but if there's a need for a clearer terminology section
in a core specification it might best be written by
someone who does have "insider"-level knowledge of
the protocol and how it's implemented, etc.  (I don't
think that need exists, for the little that's worth).

Melinda