[Drip] Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-ietf-drip-registries-26
Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 26 April 2025 18:18 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tm-rid@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.147] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EB42193576; Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <174569153840.295337.18113350073729895748@dt-datatracker-7bd7b9d5d5-79vfh>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:18:58 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: ZNQ25LB46V2VG4JMSC2DO5MKUGSQMDGZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZNQ25LB46V2VG4JMSC2DO5MKUGSQMDGZ
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-drip-registries.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Jouni Korhonen <jounikor@gmail.com>
Subject: [Drip] Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-ietf-drip-registries-26
List-Id: Drone Remote Identification Protocol <tm-rid.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/TCQ2T3V21OFRvMG17EJdQ03Lb74>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tm-rid-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tm-rid-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tm-rid-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-drip-registries Title: DRIP Entity Tags (DET) in the Domain Name System (DNS) Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Has Nits I am the assigned OPSDIR for this document. I cannot claim any adequate understanding of the DRIP in general as it was a totally new topic to me. Anyway, having still read the document I think it is ready with nits. Editorial: * Title "DRIP Entity Tags (DET) in the Domain Name System (DNS)" just don't understand why using so may abbreviations in th title. I would use at most "DRIP Entity Tags in the Domain Name System" * The document uses heavily abbreviations from RFC9434 and RFC9374. Sometimes (in most case) these are still expanded but sometimes not. Good example is DRIP itself. I would urge some better consistency with abbreviations. Also, it would be great to state that abbreviations and definitions of e.g. these two mentioned RFCs are used. * RAA and HDA 14 scheme is somewhat confusing on the first read. Having a "2 bit at time" illustrated example somewhere is Section 6.2.1 would be great to show how RAA gets shifted by 2 bits etc in the final IPV6 address. Substantial: * Section 3 second paragraph: "delegation. As such the IPv6 prefix of RAAs are 2001:3x:xxx::/44 and HDAs are 2001:3x:xxxy:yy::/56 with respective nibble reverse domains" I believe both prefix examples are wrong and should be 2001:3x:xxx0::/44 and HDA 2001:3x:xxxy:yy00::/56
- [Drip] Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-ietf… Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
- [Drip] Re: Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-… Adam Wiethuechter
- [Drip] Re: Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-… jouni korhonen