IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 11 September 2015 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9131B502E for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ad762evOtOIg for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C121B502C for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D824F24181; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:06:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wc974Dcmw5i9; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF5BF24162; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:05:40 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <55F2EAA4.3040503@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:05:29 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E16CB3D1-4027-477D-BF5F-81F536234C47@vigilsec.com>
References: <55F2EAA4.3040503@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/-OaEPYdMxNHsysHVJQ0QA_mhgvo>
Cc: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:06:12 -0000

Lou:

> So what's the right way to report an issue with ical.ietf.org?
> 
> I see an issue with a meeting from yesterday 9/10/15 on
> https://ical.ietf.org/public.php/IAOC/calendar and it looks like the
> issues is also there for future meetings.
> 
> The meeting correctly shows in Thunderbird as occurring at noon ET, but
> on google calendar it shows at 10am ET.  Interesting, this has not been
> an issue for other calendars, e.g., finance.

How can it be a problem with the server that two different clients are displaying different results?  I assume the entries are provided by the server in UTC and that the conversion is done by the client.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email