Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue
Glen <glen@amsl.com> Wed, 16 September 2015 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <glen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778E01B344F for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7Vdcyx2B9Gj for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A5F1B34CB for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F166D1E5A22 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (mail-ob0-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C19E21E59EB for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obqa2 with SMTP id a2so153872320obq.3 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.16.135 with SMTP id g7mr24487335obd.67.1442421053298; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.102.71 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55F8E38F.7080901@labn.net>
References: <55F2EAA4.3040503@labn.net> <CABL0ig5fUgUK=Ewi3EtWVkyMqnWxddWkRVpF4Or7x7sg9CnPvw@mail.gmail.com> <CABL0ig5i0T3Zum-B=NypPfqC7T9gThT++fer50sqfm-x+9Xx8g@mail.gmail.com> <55F31680.6080100@labn.net> <14fc7535b48.2818.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <CABL0ig76yvn_S1gO9hj=inUgoYCJAM2zP+QkSnRxvQi2Jas1Nw@mail.gmail.com> <55F8E38F.7080901@labn.net>
From: Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:30:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABL0ig5-LcUV-phXamaTUrKyKiKU3VVY-4dOADt0e4+fXVWmuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c338ec7fc347051fdfd2a6"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/PolOU5NJjNvsw-Xdiw9SiXqnHEI>
Cc: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: glen@amsl.com
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:30:57 -0000
Hi Lou - Not that I'm aware of.... ietfa:~ # date Wed Sep 16 09:28:34 PDT 2015 ietfa:~ # sntp -s pool.ntp.org 16 Sep 09:28:36 sntp[15416]: Started sntp 2015-09-16 09:28:38.235822 (+0800) -0.00297 +/- 0.028366 secs 2015-09-16 09:28:38.234173 (+0800) +0.005258 +/- 0.003143 secs 2015-09-16 09:28:38.241367 (+0800) +0.000079 +/- 0.025818 secs ietfa:~ # date Wed Sep 16 09:28:39 PDT 2015 We check the clocks as part of our weekly maintenance, and ensure they are synced to the global time servers. The above was a manual resync I ran just now - we seem to be on point there. Interesting find about the https:// though... Glen On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: > Well in trying a test with removing Z I found something really interesting: > > All works well if the non-https version is used > (http://ical.ietf.org/public.php/IAOC/calendar) > > Is there perhaps something odd on the server's time setting (assuming > google is somehow using tls time...)? > > Lou > > > On 9/14/2015 12:15 PM, Glen wrote: > > Hi Lou - > > > > I"m trying to follow this... but in the thread you link to, and the > > 4/1 response you cite, it seems that Google is talking about the > > manual import of ICS files, and saying that it is fixed, which it is. > > I can manually import the ICS file, and the timezones are all correct > > on my Google Calendar. It seems that the problem only occurs with > > calendar subscriptions. > > > > In addition, you mention someone removing UTC times from the ICS... > > When I do a survey of the exported ICS, it seems that about half the > > times are in UTC format (e.g. DTSTART:20131219T150000Z), and the other > > roughly half appear to have time zone specifiers. (e.g. > > DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20150910T120000). I do not have any way > > of automatically making the calendar server remove all the "Z" times > > from its feed, and converting them to some time of local time - that > > is a function of each calendar item's creation and time zone settings. > > > > Interestingly, the item in question - the one malfunctioning - is the > > one I cited above, and it is *not* a "Z" time, but is in fact a > > localized timezone time. I reviewed the file output, and compared > > them to 2445/5545, and the output seems to be exactly compliant. We > > also have a properly-constructed VTIMEZONE stanza for it, and it is, > > as already cited, working for all other platforms (including Google's > > manual import.) > > > > So I'm still in the same place - our server is functioning, and > > functioning correctly, and RFC-compliant, and although I can confirm > > that Google is mangling this on import, I do not have any connections > > to Google that would enable me to "run this down..." much as I, too, > > would like to see this solved for their platform. > > > > I am open to any thoughts or suggestions... Do we know anyone at > > Google who participates in the IETF that might have some access to > > work on this, for example? > > > > Glen > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net > > <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote: > > > > Glenn, > > > > Looks like others have seen similar issues and worked with Google > > to resolve, see links below. Given that there will likely be other > > Google users of the ietf ical server it's probably worth running > > this to ground... > > > > Lou > > > > - > > > https://productforums.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/calendar/GouovR3g4LY > > < > https://productforums.google.com/forum/m/#%21topic/calendar/GouovR3g4LY>. > > Look at the 4/1 response. > > > > - I lost the link, but someone solve the issues by removing any Z > > (utc) based times from the ics > > > > > > > > > > On September 11, 2015 2:00:09 PM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net > > <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote: > > > > another data point: > > https://ical.ietf.org/public.php/IAOC/finance > > > > works fine... > > > > On 9/11/2015 1:00 PM, Glen wrote: > > > > Here's an interesting data point: > > > > If I download the file at the > > https://ical.ietf.org/public.php/IAOC/calendar URL > > manually, and save > > it as an ICS file on my desktop, and then I "Import" that > > file into > > Google, the times display correctly. > > > > It is only if I ask Google to "subscribe" to the URL in > > live-feed mode > > that it seems to incorrectly compute the times. > > > > > > > > > > As there is no difference in the data flow or what is > > pulled (since > > the Calendar server sends everything via HTTP in the same > > way), I > > wonder if something in Google's subscription processor is > > tripping on > > something somewhere. > > > > That's not a solution - because you obviously want the > > live feed - but > > it does provide an additional point of validation, if you > > like, of the > > data. > > > > Glen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Glen <glen@amsl.com > > <mailto:glen@amsl.com> > > <mailto:glen@amsl.com <mailto:glen@amsl.com>>> wrote: > > > > Hi Lou - > > > > AMS (ietf-action@ietf.org > > <mailto:ietf-action@ietf.org> <mailto:ietf-action@ietf.org > > <mailto:ietf-action@ietf.org>>) would be > > the correct place to report a problem with the > > calendar *server* - > > for example, if the calendar server were down, or you > > couldn't get > > access, or something like that. > > > > But I confess I have no idea how or where to "report" > > the problem > > you're encountering. > > > > When I view the feed you mention, I see the meeting > > coded as: > > > > DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20150910T130000 > > DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20150910T120000 > > > > So the calendar server appears to be delivering it > > correctly, as > > you point out. > > > > The question seems to be why Google calendar is > > misinterpreting > > the coding here. > > > > I also use Gogole calendar, and it is also > > misinterpreting the > > coding for me.... but I cannot tell why, nor would I > > know to whom > > that should be reported. > > > > I welcome thoughts on this matter! > > > > Glen > > Glen Barney > > IT Director > > AMS (IETF Secretariat) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Lou Berger > > <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net> > > <mailto:lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>>> > > wrote: > > > > So what's the right way to report an issue with > > ical.ietf.org <http://ical.ietf.org> > > <http://ical.ietf.org>? > > > > I see an issue with a meeting from yesterday > > 9/10/15 on > > https://ical.ietf.org/public.php/IAOC/calendar and > > it looks > > like the > > issues is also there for future meetings. > > > > The meeting correctly shows in Thunderbird as > > occurring at > > noon ET, but > > on google calendar it shows at 10am ET. > > Interesting, this has > > not been > > an issue for other calendars, e.g., finance. > > > > Thanks, > > Lou > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list > > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org > > <mailto:TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org> > > <mailto:TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org > > <mailto:TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org>> > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list > > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org <mailto:TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development >
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Lou Berger
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Lou Berger
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Lou Berger
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Lou Berger
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Lou Berger
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Lou Berger
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Benson Schliesser
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Benson Schliesser
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Lou Berger
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Glen
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] ical server issue Russ Housley