[TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Is the inline-errata SOW ready to ship?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CB91204E0 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_1cB6J_mmVo for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BACA81204FD for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x31J1QCd021011 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:01:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1554145287; bh=PGdtofhFWioNAtzC3lOR8NVJK3SpLiO73e6Q+75ynlA=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=kT9FiPUWgJv7ETwUaKtGI9keHwx3bfQ87YpwLC/187iYxJ4H9ZnyBK1S2FBCVNgZP aZIJFjSN9gt8HLKoOkvprkHKLOt/WbABw74Mstl8IEzrpKzfsIKogZ++ZimkALOWBP HVpjoOmEh5LcCtyvqbmdywZzoUBswfW47jIm4/iM=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <eb5571fc-933d-c6aa-6d2c-feca2afc9b07@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:01:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/ZXkiQwzTX18rHDhUANKX-gM30L4>
Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Is the inline-errata SOW ready to ship?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:01:37 -0000

We've had several conversations (and will likely continue to have more) 
about how the RFC Editor might represent the output of this tool, but 
none of them impacted the requirements on the tool itself.

I believe this is ready to issue as an RFP.

Is anyone aware of anything in it that needs to change before we do that?

RjS

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-6eBrNPC7aIxOTChdIZE7fecbxUJ7kq-F6RhyCNUGI/edit?usp=sharing