Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Is the inline-errata SOW ready to ship?
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0A1120047 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G0bsEZAxZhvN for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F56C120021 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D20300ADB for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:41:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CrLPjKqDteS3 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8DAB3005AB; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <eb5571fc-933d-c6aa-6d2c-feca2afc9b07@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 17:59:55 -0400
Cc: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <403A2FF4-1CB4-47FA-94AE-380CC93FC5D6@vigilsec.com>
References: <eb5571fc-933d-c6aa-6d2c-feca2afc9b07@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/gj5gMi_Zq5vdb_DX4zKAK5cqhVM>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Is the inline-errata SOW ready to ship?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 22:00:05 -0000
I just took another look, and it seems to be ready. Russ > On Apr 1, 2019, at 3:01 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > > We've had several conversations (and will likely continue to have more) about how the RFC Editor might represent the output of this tool, but none of them impacted the requirements on the tool itself. > > I believe this is ready to issue as an RFP. > > Is anyone aware of anything in it that needs to change before we do that? > > RjS > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-6eBrNPC7aIxOTChdIZE7fecbxUJ7kq-F6RhyCNUGI/edit?usp=sharing > > _
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Is the inline-errata SOW read… Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Is the inline-errata SOW … Russ Housley