Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Does anyone else find it hard tracking Discuss discussions?

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

I'm not sure I understand why you need the version number, but for sure 
your process needs it for something. Anyway, I'm grepping for the draft 
name without the version number, because that lets me find the right 
mails regardless of any intervening draft updates (that might affect 
this or some other discuss). I'd prefer not to have extra characters 
like "<>", or the ".txt".

Jari

Robert Sparks kirjoitti:
> We could use just first names (assuming the tracker makes this easy) for now and leave breadcrumbs for someone to
> change it later if we have a name collision.
>
> What about the version number - for my purposes, that is pretty important. I would be willing to remove the .txt.
>
> RjS
>
> On Oct 29, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
>   
>> Robert Sparks kirjoitti:
>>     
>>> To make sure I understand, does this match 3b?
>>>
>>> *DISCUSS/COMMENT: <draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05.txt> (Lars Eggert)*
>>>
>>>       
>> No, because I was suggesting the use of first name. I realize that it may not be unique in all cases. But I also like relatively short subject liunes.
>>
>> Jari
>>
>>     
>>> RjS
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> +1 to 3b
>>>>
>>>> - Ralph
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:25 AM 10/29/10, Jari Arkko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> 3
>>>>>
>>>>> or 3b: "DISCUSS: draft-foo (Jari)"
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>
>
>