IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Does anyone else find it hard tracking Discuss discussions?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 29 October 2010 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1273A67FC; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73q+tq4kmVzJ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E9A3A67AD; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (pool-173-71-48-4.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.71.48.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9THDdtu015464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:13:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-23-827574017"
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BDDE902-6C0D-484E-B90C-80D3F8C58B26@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:13:39 -0500
Message-Id: <CBE59258-A904-4249-8721-04337AE61F53@nostrum.com>
References: <C8F04FDE.1F538%wpolk@nist.gov> <43E157B3-2E40-42BD-93B6-83017977120B@nostrum.com> <4CCAE766.2060603@piuha.net> <5BDDE902-6C0D-484E-B90C-80D3F8C58B26@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 173.71.48.4 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Polk, William T." <william.polk@nist.gov>, tools-development@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Does anyone else find it hard tracking Discuss discussions?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-development>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:11:51 -0000

To make sure I understand, does this match 3b?

DISCUSS/COMMENT: <draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05.txt> (Lars Eggert)

RjS

On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:

> +1 to 3b
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:25 AM 10/29/10, Jari Arkko wrote:
> 
>> 3
>> 
>> or 3b: "DISCUSS: draft-foo (Jari)"
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email