IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] expert reviews queries ... are they being answered?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 10 April 2024 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4427C14F69E for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jsCpqJKz6LKD for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBBF1C14F699 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918BD3898B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7hPwsgj7f6kY for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:19:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F004238988 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:19:28 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1712751568; bh=ZlY6hySBwggKa/MzbbwVnmuJ5ScoVu4/FCxasP0KWPg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=u16sX0toSJs3GW28DLrYZ7b2r2BJLf7yhTOgcJg9tZEdGhxG/zP8uqXQolAeOp/EO Ryor2DwMt2YpQeQB12nCbbmiHPoqCnarPbeRNdNGGca01u7bXIzG5oMZgiTCikwztM lQlYeK1b6HXHoVP6WRb0kDJ3CO3F6xFhNpwHMDX+cQHz/og4NcponbOPIxP5BcUpYi wDizdZrmJBmvvHEvKQykZV7EwyhaXdvfYKZ1XcCwiBapHp5Xw07aJZdjFxndrcjbRq RHOC1XvO3KUzSW/0qPfajHQtc8MgmYIza3U8bEOPib+8TWk+sSDTznxTuTfvhrXOOJ 69kOdI9oDg9tA==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CBB49 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:19:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:19:28 -0400
Message-ID: <6334.1712751568@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/-jY6DxFOLlP1Yl_nPY6b6lLswfk>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] expert reviews queries ... are they being answered?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:19:38 -0000

I feel like I'm seeing an increasing number of expert review requests.
I can't tell if I'm seeing more, but I feel like maybe I'm seeing them
repeated more often.  Maybe emails from IANA are going to spam more often?
I have no quantitative way to judge.

I know that IANA have an issue tracker, and I see the issue number in the
subject.   I don't think that there is a way for me, an expert reviewer, to
see if there are any issues open at IANA that are waitiing for me.
(Maybe the issue tracker is publically viewable, I dunno)

Is there any work that might improve this situation?
AFAIK, IANA registries have no representation in the DT, so the set of expert
reviewers would not be recorded in the DT.  Nor would which documents have
created which registries be visible in the DT.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email