Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 19 August 2014 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B872D1A893B for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTxsoiiQNxKy for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32DDC1A8940 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7JExcOK058393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:37 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <AD0094F9-9BDE-4BF0-81FC-C2F12DC262F2@vpnc.org>
References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/0AifYYxsQhUtPfNM1IJbUfyku2k
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:59:43 -0000

On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> On 2014-08-18 20:24 Paul Hoffman said the following:
>> Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show
>> new drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but
>> draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that
>> (:-)) and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the
>> SLA, or an operational bug?
> 
> Sounds like a bug.  I'm investigating.

It showed up on tools.ietf.org about an hour after posting.

--Paul Hoffman