Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 19 August 2014 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1581A03CF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ymHKkSGGbhfK for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from egssmtp01.att.com (egssmtp01.att.com [144.160.112.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808FD1A03A8 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by egssmtp01.att.com ( egs 8.14.5 TLS/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7JF8S9T026223 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:08:28 -0500
Received: from vpn-135-70-97-64.vpn.swst.att.com ([135.70.97.64]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20140819150827gw100j0ctpe>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:08:28 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.97.64]
Message-ID: <53F3689E.7090803@att.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:09:18 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> <AD0094F9-9BDE-4BF0-81FC-C2F12DC262F2@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <AD0094F9-9BDE-4BF0-81FC-C2F12DC262F2@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Crp8igIOsQJ87lwjZa5mT7knh4Y
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:08:32 -0000

On 8/19/14, 10:59 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On 2014-08-18 20:24 Paul Hoffman said the following:
>>> Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show
>>> new drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but
>>> draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that
>>> (:-)) and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the
>>> SLA, or an operational bug?
>> Sounds like a bug.  I'm investigating.
> It showed up on tools.ietf.org about an hour after posting.

A useful enhancement is for the 404 processor to double check to see if 
this is a new document before reporting such the 404 Not Found error. If 
it finds it, it initiates an immediate update for that document.

Should this be added to the code sprint's list of items?

     Tony