Re: [Tools-discuss] Change in datatracker behavior

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Thu, 25 July 2013 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D17F21F86BE; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aG9OohlYfQGG; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DFE21F86B2; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41345 helo=vigonier.local ident=henrik) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1V2FBJ-0006ds-N9; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:37:45 +0200
Message-ID: <51F0C7B9.1020408@levkowetz.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:37:45 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <040601ce88a5$89a0c800$9ce25800$@olddog.co.uk> <51F033F4.1020509@levkowetz.com> <51F034C7.5040108@levkowetz.com> <CALaySJJsg4vK1nz0i+N3FOoLM+kfLTmGtWbVPLbmWw_n+zekYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJsg4vK1nz0i+N3FOoLM+kfLTmGtWbVPLbmWw_n+zekYA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: barryleiba@computer.org, adrian@olddog.co.uk, iesg@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Change in datatracker behavior
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:37:50 -0000

Hi Barry,

On 2013-07-24 22:28 Barry Leiba said the following:
>> I just looked a little bit at this, and it might actually be correct, as
>> the RFC is considered just another instance of the document which started
>> out as draft-..., as you'll see if you look at the history tab.
>>
>> What did you expect; what were you looking for on the draft page?
> 
> I'm not certain, but I'm *pretty sure* this didn't used to work that
> way -- that we used to be able to see the page for last version of the
> draft.
> 
> That said, the main problems are these:
> 
> - The tools version lets one look at each version of the document
> explicitly, but the datatracker doesn't.  This isn't a change, of
> course.

Ah.  Right.  

> - When the document was draft-ietf-mpls-fastreroute-mib-21, the
> history tab let us look at diffs between any pair of versions, 00 thru
> 21.  Now that it's RFC 6445, the history tab no longer allows any
> diffs at all.  I'm pretty sure this is a change.  In any case, it's
> unfortunate.

Oops!  Yes, that's a regression.  I'll find out where *that* went, and
bring it back.

> The workaround is, of course, to use the tools version.

Right, but you shouldn't need to; the diff functionality should be there.


Best regards,

	Henrik