IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] Mailman login vs. datatracker login

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 09 August 2020 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C76E3A0B88 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 05:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xxu5wimLslfi for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 05:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8543A0B86 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 05:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.101] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BPfJN6MZ4zyRy; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 14:57:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 618670644.288271-c3a018857607c6ebc29b94a5ee3bc009
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 14:57:24 +0200
Message-Id: <900A7317-AE80-466B-B1B0-1BA5B892BF75@tzi.org>
To: Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/2aQ5jBIa32Mn1U3dDfItvlig0vY>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Mailman login vs. datatracker login
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 12:57:31 -0000

It is a bit hard to search for mailman issues in tools-discuss (every message contains “mailman”), so I apologize if this is a repeat:

Are we up now for a future where we can couple our mailman logins to our datatracker logins? Today, mailman passwords need to be all different because they are shared with different groups.  However, they cannot use normal password manager support.
Not needing to remember them would be a step forward.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email