IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Mailman login vs. datatracker login

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sun, 09 August 2020 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705933A0F6F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ym-Ghse-oDFE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818613A0F69 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 079NXVkm015686; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:36:16 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=sU4wGAoZicYf+NMPTKnLQAYyI8zNGaAn8NkJLpgeqUU=; b=lXiKhRr1ftArwBz7Op2DlaDLZmsvCc6wJL1F6zz2V08mwI+nFTmAp8VgGme2sONxxcSJ 9ZfosjaVndtP6+QTIlbTLS1FIvSEyBhhZMuDT8ybhbihPdGTMazosttPqYyyOIfwbDl7 bJSt0GFEwhUJOX7vWtw+ThDf//haNWINJs2tfuBu2e5N+OV7BpbU0NCz34zAh1tJ10t2 kszQTDCFWLhwYPssxprKdHzJDmBbiL3uupd4irA5eWrWKUWAe3fyIc96mQrB+beNxS1i voRU7Mbodh2sO9nRSn7ynOOXcT14pXbFNK/AODNlsq7vmwZifRvG92aeNTVwlSC10ZmB 8g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a72-247-45-32.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.32] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 32sm42hgr2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:36:16 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 079NYotu017136; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 19:36:15 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.118]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 32sqcxfa30-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 09 Aug 2020 19:36:15 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 18:36:14 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 18:36:14 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] Mailman login vs. datatracker login
Thread-Index: AQHWbkyp7x1SvvEaU0CC9Sqw3Ddw6KkwjtoA///xDIA=
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:36:14 +0000
Message-ID: <76AE73EF-4890-41DF-ADF0-FE8741993BB3@akamai.com>
References: <900A7317-AE80-466B-B1B0-1BA5B892BF75@tzi.org> <17459.1597004984@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <17459.1597004984@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.113.183]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <856CABFC4B6C3B42A76F72C723DC2DC0@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-09_12:2020-08-06, 2020-08-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=662 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008090183
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-09_12:2020-08-06, 2020-08-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=613 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008090182
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/UYaOAcwf9qDtPjLNL8Y8zZSXWbE>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Mailman login vs. datatracker login
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:36:24 -0000

>    Specifically, since mailman does not have a "username" equivalent field, the
    browser password managers can not distinguish passwords for different lists.
  

Yes, havng a dummy/unused username field would help password managers a great deal.  I've asked for that before but maybe not in the right places.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email