IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS bug

Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com> Wed, 28 August 2019 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jyasskin@google.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F4F1200D6 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34JY3mivonnE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24A7C1200CD for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id r5so746897lfc.3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dhtzH99LK18zme1IuuER2gOqaRiOblz7k4YGR21AfPk=; b=flZrBu44xlePJzpjbFRTB/Jk4wV4ScU4+RbKxHKM4cIb+JGKS9ovUnCw8IJ5BjsX92 jrAJ7pPkA38MxPS7cnQOLmSh9CIalOEgEFDxmJ34une9cWpL9RuLrVysO9emIiJNJmyo Vwmt0fDOinljI4uSLPYWS1V/pgN7xjwNA+ytgi/4wLEPGU/lZNW/MXiEyI0NJ3nqQvFj mWFfxBaKLDK1mxKdT/3jci+RUNHxb6AkOV0FrB1rVlYDJSR3HDoSneRnmhylDP9p6fyR cJEp6oDHYqSXCtUJucuPgaef2XGbQJ1dydtXeZU8el4DNId462SciLNQhX8IHSccoFrb 3aCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dhtzH99LK18zme1IuuER2gOqaRiOblz7k4YGR21AfPk=; b=mJjUwQYc4/fAwiXT8JnZ4MI53Xl22LGFt1pzVaQrsyGD52vlpm5rz0cxyAPeZ/DimK 1l0d/mkOqDDo+cBlz5zSHe1pDC6VugMdzvO6cOiZH91e72LQ35TSVBdk6kqKT4FQ0ymX AIXLe39D2Thzm7G3Vp3jg8ciuGae5kqqK1dzAaJ8zcNL2/ozwu27KcP7oWAA/SMn6C5c r94et+lgxmvey1jOzAJMtMXqyhA8wcKyOExkp49+wQm/mhnkefJAkQ8Oh6t5/dMzFX2i OJcvMRCsBvU5CsEe4mKiLkvZausX7kO/70hUXJeIm7cZXorGI4+3KyZbp0CAKe/hbeaT 3U9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWlwMK/W1V3DVgfjVzC9FQJtVWwjzp8MFPmeXNDOsY1OiIV5PnG BWaFZfeyTpaqIRqBBeG6a2t8bV3pABJPw7rxfYhD4g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxOXNUb075oJG32MBlC5N8gwAQysCaqzV2CtdmcaCfDzmsJ4MLKNQZ9kYF/a2jytS+F3fa9SCv3QRwiju5uDXk=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6556:: with SMTP id c22mr3885467lfj.90.1567027022918; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANh-dXmkoGgRBHXXcE+Ha1nkWcmKNMXW=WDnwHB4RWmM+QXsUg@mail.gmail.com> <432c82bc-d63b-43a0-96e8-f36e5d9d1be8@levkowetz.com> <CAHw9_i+xq4Wni2nmVoywDC5zirRaYaUfF+C=_nMWiS5p50YzsA@mail.gmail.com> <e63d4330-f6c8-6312-55c7-ca322d50207d@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <e63d4330-f6c8-6312-55c7-ca322d50207d@gmx.de>
From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:16:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CANh-dXnOnvC8RfQJ2wX1WSobtXghkLnjgRMOwVmxg1MRTnMVXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/4trqe5cQDrEmOYUv1F24_Cou2UQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS bug
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:17:07 -0000

Thanks for pointing out that this changes across browsers and
versions. I've filed
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=998893 so Chrome
folks can look into it and undo the change if it's incorrect.

Is the line-height:0 really needed in the RFC style? It doesn't seem
like you intend 0-height lines here.

Jeffrey

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:57 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 27.08.2019 16:29, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > Broken for me -- image: http://www.owl-stretching-time.com/css.png
> >
> > Running:
> > Google Chrome77.0.3865.42 (Official Build) beta (64-bit)
> > Revision560add2406a0e2970a0c7983e3a3fb36bcdc7d5c-refs/branch-heads/3865@{#523}
> > OSmacOS Version 10.14.6 (Build 18G87)
> > JavaScriptV8 7.7.299.4
> >
> > W
> > ...
>
> I can confirm that Chrome 77 (beta) shows the breakage, while 76 does
> not. I'll leave it to CSS experts to decide, who's bug this is...
>
> Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email