Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS bug

Hi Jeffrey,

On 2019-08-28 23:16, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out that this changes across browsers and
> versions. I've filed
> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=998893 so Chrome
> folks can look into it and undo the change if it's incorrect.

Ack, thanks!

> Is the line-height:0 really needed in the RFC style? It doesn't seem
> like you intend 0-height lines here.

I'm not sure -- it's probably 15 years since I put together the CSS for
the htmlized documents, and the only thing I've tweaked since is the
horizontal placement (left vs. center) of the document text in the viewport.

I'll go and have a look, but I suspect I had a reason at the time.  There
could very well be much better CSS solutions today, though.

Best regards,

	Henrik

> Jeffrey
> 
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:57 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 27.08.2019 16:29, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> > Broken for me -- image: http://www.owl-stretching-time.com/css.png
>> >
>> > Running:
>> > Google Chrome77.0.3865.42 (Official Build) beta (64-bit)
>> > Revision560add2406a0e2970a0c7983e3a3fb36bcdc7d5c-refs/branch-heads/3865@{#523}
>> > OSmacOS Version 10.14.6 (Build 18G87)
>> > JavaScriptV8 7.7.299.4
>> >
>> > W
>> > ...
>>
>> I can confirm that Chrome 77 (beta) shows the breakage, while 76 does
>> not. I'll leave it to CSS experts to decide, who's bug this is...
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> 

Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS bug

Attachment: signature.asc