Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08.txt

Bill Fenner <fenner@gmail.com> Wed, 11 May 2005 23:00 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DW0Bh-0000PI-M4; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:00:21 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DW0Bf-0000PD-JA for tools-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:00:19 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA07288 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:00:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.196]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DW0RG-0007gK-8r for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:16:27 -0400
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so150330rng for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WdsoqFcY/H/Rqv5tU14ki/25mfGo47yQbdi6trpsqBfbOAKAleT/E0ec/Qx3I1KaFaqV7CNKdDt5QpFbji0uxd+44W3KNZOtu7keYBNtF91HqI18zIQfURAPtvQC/qYrMqEaVZo/ViVH/HSwhsu3yJqcgpqXTDWhUxmL2xuLUjw=
Received: by 10.38.90.51 with SMTP id n51mr489917rnb; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.10.77 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ed6d469d050511160031dc31ae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:00:16 -0700
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Elvey <matthew@elvey.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08.txt
In-Reply-To: <428126DA.20207@elvey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <428126DA.20207@elvey.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Bill Fenner <fenner@gmail.com>
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On 5/10/05, Matthew Elvey <matthew@elvey.com> wrote:
> Even though the RFC Editors reportedly* don't use
> nroff/troff any more

The antecedent of "it" in the email is not "nroff sources" but is "my
nroff sources".  The RFC Editor still uses nroff, they just
(reportedly) don't use nroff sources that people submit (mostly
because people like to use macros and the RFC Editor doesn't trust
macros as different versions of the macros can create different
results, and they want to be able to recreate the exact bits of a
given RFC).

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss