Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08.txt
Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Sat, 14 May 2005 08:41 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWsDW-0007BS-Go; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:41:50 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWkJa-0003jI-AB for tools-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 20:15:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24644 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2005 20:15:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net ([81.228.9.102]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DWkZb-0003pM-Qn for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 20:32:08 -0400
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (213-64-173-70-o871.telia.com [213.64.173.70]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF8238260 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DWkJI-0007zx-Nj for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:16 +0200
Message-ID: <42854314.5020400@levkowetz.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:16 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08.txt
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070608020706020501000502"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3a4bc66230659131057bb68ed51598f8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 May 2005 04:41:49 -0400
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Forwarding this to the list - for some reason it had been auto-discarded by Mailman. Matthew Elvey <matthew@elvey.com> wrote on Thu, 12 May 2005 10:34:51 -0700: > On 5/11/05 7:51 AM, Alex Rousskov sent forth electrons to convey: > >> I believe it is better to have in imperfect auto-comparison (and risk >> a few rogue drafts to be published) than an imperfect conversion >> (and risk many corrupted drafts to be published). > > I'm convinced. > >> >> For example, I doubt spam will come with IETF-compliant IPR disclosures >> any time soon. > > Spammers already write custom software to steal IP space, sign up for > mailing list, IM, email and wiki accounts, etc. But I agree - it > (SpamAssassin integration) doesn't need to be in the current spec. > >> >> However, I agree that adding spam or other filters to the email interface >> would be possible if such filters are needed. > > It's not just the email interface I'd protect. > > Bill: Sorry for the confusion. > > Brian: Thanks. (I'll certainly be using XML in my next I-D - with > emacs' PSGML unless I get feedback suggesting otherwise.) >
--- Begin Message ---On 5/11/05 7:51 AM, Alex Rousskov sent forth electrons to convey: > I believe it is better to have in imperfect auto-comparison (and risk > a few rogue drafts to be published) than an imperfect conversion > (and risk many corrupted drafts to be published). I'm convinced. > > For example, I doubt spam will come with IETF-compliant IPR disclosures > any time soon. Spammers already write custom software to steal IP space, sign up for mailing list, IM, email and wiki accounts, etc. But I agree - it (SpamAssassin integration) doesn't need to be in the current spec. > > However, I agree that adding spam or other filters to the email interface > would be possible if such filters are needed. It's not just the email interface I'd protect. Bill: Sorry for the confusion. Brian: Thanks. (I'll certainly be using XML in my next I-D - with emacs' PSGML unless I get feedback suggesting otherwise.)--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
- [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-draf… Matthew Elvey
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-… Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-… Bill Fenner
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-… Henrik Levkowetz