Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08.txt

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Sat, 14 May 2005 08:41 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWsDW-0007BS-Go; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:41:50 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWkJa-0003jI-AB for tools-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 20:15:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24644 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2005 20:15:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net ([81.228.9.102]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DWkZb-0003pM-Qn for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 20:32:08 -0400
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (213-64-173-70-o871.telia.com [213.64.173.70]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF8238260 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DWkJI-0007zx-Nj for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:16 +0200
Message-ID: <42854314.5020400@levkowetz.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:16 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08.txt
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070608020706020501000502"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3a4bc66230659131057bb68ed51598f8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 May 2005 04:41:49 -0400
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Forwarding this to the list - for some reason it had been auto-discarded
by Mailman.

Matthew Elvey <matthew@elvey.com> wrote on Thu, 12 May 2005 10:34:51 -0700:

> On 5/11/05 7:51 AM, Alex Rousskov sent forth electrons to convey:
> 
>> I believe it is better to have in imperfect auto-comparison (and risk
>> a few rogue drafts to be published) than an imperfect conversion
>> (and risk many corrupted drafts to be published). 
> 
> I'm convinced.
> 
>>
>> For example, I doubt spam will come with IETF-compliant IPR disclosures
>> any time soon.
> 
> Spammers already write custom software to steal IP space, sign up for 
> mailing list, IM, email and wiki accounts, etc.  But I agree - it 
> (SpamAssassin integration) doesn't need to be in the current spec.
> 
>>
>> However, I agree that adding spam or other filters to the email interface
>> would be possible if such filters are needed. 
> 
> It's not just the email interface I'd protect.
> 
> Bill: Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Brian: Thanks.  (I'll certainly be using XML in my next I-D  - with 
> emacs' PSGML unless I get feedback suggesting otherwise.)
> 
--- Begin Message ---
On 5/11/05 7:51 AM, Alex Rousskov sent forth electrons to convey:

> I believe it is better to have in imperfect auto-comparison (and risk
> a few rogue drafts to be published) than an imperfect conversion
> (and risk many corrupted drafts to be published). 

I'm convinced.

>
> For example, I doubt spam will come with IETF-compliant IPR disclosures
> any time soon.

Spammers already write custom software to steal IP space, sign up for 
mailing list, IM, email and wiki accounts, etc.  But I agree - it 
(SpamAssassin integration) doesn't need to be in the current spec.

>
> However, I agree that adding spam or other filters to the email interface
> would be possible if such filters are needed. 

It's not just the email interface I'd protect.

Bill: Sorry for the confusion.

Brian: Thanks.  (I'll certainly be using XML in my next I-D  - with 
emacs' PSGML unless I get feedback suggesting otherwise.)


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss