IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Recommendation 9 from Results and analysis of the survey of I-D authors on formats and tools

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sat, 06 February 2021 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F743A1076 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:24:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=YGZH5kVi; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Zi8rqUvx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GEXooW0L4LHV for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:24:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF643A1073 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:24:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A335C00E1; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:24:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:24:23 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=L OR5xeMacMVeDo9V7gE1897oMKQmr7fdDnNRLM8Q8ME=; b=YGZH5kViIvQD2JVui 4OWFpBuI+AhiCHmvEuloSTdWFQrvowbdmMWKnS6IW2TRXk7wZwupEfJ1d1WyVEbH eqpvNE8egEYOTQ6NZ2PZLuRzW+LG+W+p0ZHXn9E+6LLVzGATR8e6weC2wdZLUuj+ ln3tobY/I5vDx+Z8ILsCFaro+vi5RsmK1km9owWCAhnOt5zy89vNZ7CeethWvMXi Gtkn7RhxHxdIx7QXY9F06eNAOH5C48bm6woQJxB+F5B/FBjTtuiDDgF1wK/2S39y 84skT833mYplOUZQmvQrZFE1oinSvKmSUiAph8hJZgl+3tTn7nLOzo6vcSFCb6Ru pVVXA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=LOR5xeMacMVeDo9V7gE1897oMKQmr7fdDnNRLM8Q8 ME=; b=Zi8rqUvxZRYdKt18JnvhyAnHs//SOQ2kKPQ35+PJUcbsK3krWw1oExHNW 1XBv5mtwaO15GYnEtOiDT/rQUebZ21bWfLD4zL5tcM6LUnKW52SggCDLUaXFajed qMVNLbRW2ZjSZKDdGEVKxMR8SVQKPok8E5PB74AVmgu/0wVusesb4WBe6US23Aqd sFqKdW99pBO0yAcG7aR9TYS++roK2PPNTFW9NiGHb5aLjw59A7Torq697hAlLoFr Wgnd9dfc8C2h57Tiu9910IUd1MgSMTjGge1sztuTi/fOs4iFtPZY+5vLSp+Q67Je UOgax7Z6MiOOEmROucFJQkGjKeseA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:1P0dYPWF5wf0q_1ld_4IkHtS2QedhOofmPtUr_TKox47z7R6FKiUPw> <xme:1P0dYHlDwJvR1cprljj5V5jQnMgY_pn15XvV8WT9w3D14GnxXAwL80o7pFWEO6fQ3 yYcZ0K_aaHULDjZ9Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeejgdeggecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepteefleffjeffhfehheeffeegudelgfeujedukeeigedvgeehffefvdehffeileek necuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrddvhe dunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhn ohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:1P0dYLbIZyabo2QQP7PtaovH8IDovt9UlGqsZHlxPkyTYjGRMqCssQ> <xmx:1P0dYKVlL7k7YMyv8ZY517EAhE17e09Z7jhIZ0gALVaESs-lpJNmaw> <xmx:1P0dYJlJ4HSJGJ97j8m-t3xk43l_ymiGhSpku44kuc4pPYKCNx9HoQ> <xmx:1_0dYPjFezcv6v9-KbCJ2sMmqnrfsckx0ic3sHUnMcvS9MNAEsN9UA>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 35B2D24005D; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:24:18 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <9EB5CCB0-C5E9-4F44-AA41-F237941BAC04@adobe.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 13:24:17 +1100
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C9DAC881-0080-4997-89D6-20A8DFAEA7E0@mnot.net>
References: <161240956258.5082.18097054694330751435@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=duU1c3g0qmNmSN9jpfq3o4Lggxg_vT3xLdmwxAzLPm0r-iQ@mail.gmail.com> <15878309-55BA-4BE0-BD26-060308BA1270@tzi.org> <E77A02FF-4DF8-4030-BC77-4355A705E00E@adobe.com> <A2CC3D3F-3920-4E51-AAD7-1FFE83CA5ECB@tzi.org> <9EB5CCB0-C5E9-4F44-AA41-F237941BAC04@adobe.com>
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/61dvhEb9IB1aTcGM28A3Bt_ImoQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Recommendation 9 from Results and analysis of the survey of I-D authors on formats and tools
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 02:24:26 -0000


> On 6 Feb 2021, at 1:35 am, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the history, Carsten – very helpful.
>  
> So then kramdown-rfc is *both* a piece of software *and* an extension specification for Markdown.  Yes?    If so, does there exist a document that describes those extensions and their behavior?   Because, to me as a standards guy, that is the important thing.   Making sure that there is a formal specification which *anyone* can use to develop their own tooling.

If only we held the XML format to such a high bar...


(I'll show myself out.)

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email