[Tools-discuss] RFC Email announcements
Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Wed, 02 February 2022 01:09 UTC
Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F373C3A1932 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:09:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkO-j-2KM3Uo for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:09:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A2F3A0125 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:09:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [107.13.246.59] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C81B91C780 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:09:07 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1643764147; bh=npo4ujRrELKBPJoIefkSw0naNKEAqZ1f3Bn0Tha8EXg=; h=Date:Subject:References:To:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=r4SzdghKPj2WL01z5KDR6Sj/fmYX9Vt3YfoST5uqPXEoIe8dV/YN5KL5GynPfb69/ iOpf64fT3OgvQ56m8Z4erjbxmEGAquK+jAdJAxyMVSBJ3QjBQwWLdrY9g58jadVqGJ k9qMEhIH25yoFoqxYNV8kL0uB4OMePlMzs4lHU9RxoJAaBkmHR1cCeRh1OGfT11kla 88UeATZvr+QehCmMe5EEmgaD/qc31jEWFVGxjAMuBqYfCydBEuv71K1uto4JmkWF/q T0T3Ig0MSLi0xB0IRVnIjs0QFLeQeGHEA7mhO3UrUfX45+XPOAb6a1ZzE+qTI6Cth3 /GGlniOkXyWaA==
Message-ID: <9174867a-2b84-1ce9-38ab-206c6b32f569@bangj.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 20:07:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
References: <20220201071749.E12CBECB8D@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Language: en-US
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220201071749.E12CBECB8D@rfc-editor.org>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20220201071749.E12CBECB8D@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/6_kMUK4Cq1It08eB2SV1Fm9KwZE>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] RFC Email announcements
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 01:09:17 -0000
The following email was received this morning announcing a new RFC. I think the link supplied to this document could be improved by referencing the rfc page instead of the info page. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9187.html Here's why: 1. We should maximize the content and not the meta data. This is a common theme and I think we should be doing everything we can to emphasize the content we create and that is used by the most number of people and not the meta data that is used by a much smaller administrative group. 2. The rfc page contains a link at the top to the info page if that's what you really want but it probably isn't because there's already lots of meta data in the email. 3. If you're really into meta-data, the top of the rfc page also contains a link to the datatracker. :) Thanks, Tom -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: RFC 9187 on Sequence Number Extension for Windowed Protocols Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:17:49 -0800 (PST) From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org CC: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9187 Title: Sequence Number Extension for Windowed Protocols Author: J. Touch Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: January 2022 Mailbox: touch@strayalpha.com Pages: 10 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-touch-sne-02.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9187 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9187 Sliding window protocols use finite sequence numbers to determine segment placement and order. These sequence number spaces wrap around and are reused during the operation of such protocols. This document describes a way to extend the size of these sequence numbers at the endpoints to avoid the impact of that wrap and reuse without transmitting additional information in the packet header. The resulting extended sequence numbers can be used at the endpoints in encryption and authentication algorithms to ensure input bit patterns do not repeat over the lifetime of a connection. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
- [Tools-discuss] RFC Email announcements Tom Pusateri
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFC Email announcements Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFC Email announcements Tom Pusateri
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFC Email announcements Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFC Email announcements Jay Daley