Re: [Tools-discuss] pages numbers in ToC in PDF

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 27 May 2021 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C3B3A0045 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z17xj6EknyBs for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694623A003F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-pool2-245.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-pool2-245.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.48.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FrcNn33yRz316L; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:51:37 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <27379.1622115270@localhost>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 20:51:37 +0200
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 643834296.92931-34a71af594f02f2cc70505ec90d9c702
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B9E7C605-2346-440B-8B6A-C61D4DF27CCD@tzi.org>
References: <27379.1622115270@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/8XBqeCFofMbD7n2BwpUjWb03UwQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] pages numbers in ToC in PDF
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:51:46 -0000

On 2021-05-27, at 13:34, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> But, that's useless if you actually dump it to tree-ware.

It’s almost Friday, so here goes:

Maybe we need to add to the boilerplate:

> Please consider the environment before dumping RFCs on dead trees.
> Since we already did that for you, we made it deliberately hard for you to use tree-based copies of RFCs.

[SCNR, no such intention actually implied]

Grüße, Carsten

PS.: 
I stopped using paper around the turn of the century.
I still would like to have page numbers!