IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] How do we diagnose DOI errors?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 19 October 2020 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6124D3A0836 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oc1U-zdmw4K0 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9B53A0832 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CFS262KYdzyRg; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <fcca51a7-16c9-11a9-e957-03dffe510c57@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:46:53 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 624829613.5231889-6e2933770efb400993eea3a19b82605d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02B52751-3EAB-46D9-B2F4-6ECC93D23ABF@tzi.org>
References: <181dadfc-37bf-46ad-b907-853cad3dccd2@www.fastmail.com> <9ee90430-405b-4cf2-b1e7-5d241698a108@www.fastmail.com> <32564.1603119444@localhost> <8b5ebbef-6dca-1f56-0576-f395815c4b40@gmx.de> <9568.1603129249@localhost> <cc0cf5ac-8706-12c4-5014-a95e7b607bd2@gmx.de> <A24AD3C4-9A92-49E6-BDA9-3BE9D8608BD9@tzi.org> <fcca51a7-16c9-11a9-e957-03dffe510c57@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/DHU_ibItt9Tcko8AJjixSwWR9q4>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] How do we diagnose DOI errors?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:46:58 -0000

On 2020-10-19, at 21:38, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>  Or just avoid include-by-reference (my preference).

I know that is your preference, but most authors do find a reference that evaluates to the most current version of the document being referenced very convenient for their own documents, which tend to live for several years before being published.

(On the publishing side, of course DO avoid include-by-reference, I’m talking about the authoring side.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email