[Tools-discuss] Lifecycle Analysis

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> Sat, 01 June 2013 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rs@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACC821F9F77 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z91WNZzZ1kla for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3796A21F9FA4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,783,1363158000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="60358643"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2013 06:11:35 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com []) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id r51DBZGZ022299 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from VMWEXCEHT06-PRD.hq.netapp.com ( by vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:11:35 -0700
Received: from SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([]) by vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:11:35 -0700
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Lifecycle Analysis
Thread-Index: Ac5eyQ27P3uv3e2HQlyROMl1f64QzQ==
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:11:34 +0000
Message-ID: <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F24BBF550@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F24BBF550SACEXCMBX02PRDh_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 06:55:42 -0700
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Lifecycle Analysis
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:11:51 -0000


Out of  curiosity I wanted to check the lifecycle stistics for the 1323bis draft, that I am editor of.

It appears, that the current tools stop processing lifecycle data, when the document is marked as expired:


Is not shown in http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/drafts.html

And stops the graph after the first expiration:


The raw data

It might be unusual for a draft to be revived after such a long hibernation phase, but I was wondering if that could nevertheless be fixed?


Richard Scheffenegger