IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc in --v2 mode -- bug report?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 13 June 2022 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBA2C157B42; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V9F-VIfEsD2i; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCE4C14F73A; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LMFh424BwzDCdF; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:23:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <49687028-4FF4-44D1-A3D3-79FDF670A5A1@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:23:15 +0200
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 676826595.799346-b1f6bb92722d1c8e17f7ebf9051a11e8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <65CCA848-8395-4530-8C08-2F0CA387746D@tzi.org>
References: <B39D28F0353AE74800217ADC@PSB> <7EDFAAE2-3109-4D16-BC16-1A47DB365522@ietf.org> <E022AAF289DF04D70F449FF7@PSB> <49687028-4FF4-44D1-A3D3-79FDF670A5A1@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/RPiXBb4UQGaWDwAnHoo2Y0bmd7w>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc in --v2 mode -- bug report?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:23:24 -0000

On 2022-06-13, at 16:21, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> DOCTYPE is a processing instruction

(Actually, no: DOCTYPE is a declaration that is part of the prolog, while PIs can occur everywhere where comments can occur.
Arcane detail inherited from SGML, which most people have forgotten as it approximately doubles the complexity of XML and has been obsoleted by Relax-NG [or WSD] anyway.
But this little terminology correction doesn’t change the gist of what you were writing.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email