Re: [Tools-discuss] [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Sun, 01 August 2021 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FA03A0DFC for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LXcEvK4gMEKZ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A133A0E00 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 171KXEII003163 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:33:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1627849994; bh=H0Wzz3iY3yKpVKQikGIxXYmxn1T1MzqmthatvBbKlC8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=lgWqgxGxICXcvxi0xgpwMLzYF3IBHlBYlRunla3z10sBfBo7Y350/eLNWOKjfG3ZX Qf02OgPWvEhDOTJaHQe91LWGLsbUvYVecwsMbbxXIVDnB6Fyv8Cjk62daACz2M3xOu U03nQz7kv7vMb7ce9qytn8cEPv172zAdIe4FCwlE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <8a1018d3-62da-a740-72d6-bb370af71a9e@joelhalpern.com> <20210731193455.C04E625657CF@ary.qy> <7A01A718-246F-4DFD-B522-EC4D7C945199@akamai.com> <72755DA5-56E8-4DF9-A2B6-2BBDD315094A@tzi.org> <daaf0898-fcaf-341b-a710-9c459edebdc1@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <c704a538-44d3-4dfe-57d0-ffd607fc3f76@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:33:09 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <daaf0898-fcaf-341b-a710-9c459edebdc1@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------52B2048CD3BFE63DC64EBA94"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/VBmbpF27iYSDKDQD9V55gg041kM>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 20:33:18 -0000

On 8/1/21 3:23 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>
> On 01/08/2021 16:47, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> OK, so the summary of the 111attendees discussion is that we don’t
>> want unauthenticated write access to meeting notes.
> Really? Seems to me the risk isn't significant enough to make
> someone do work and there's plenty of opportunity to read the
> draft meeting notes. I don't really object to requiring note
> takers be authenticated but it doesn't seem that worthwhile.

Hi Stephen -

I've moved any pages I create to requiring login for two benefits - 
First, I know who contributed to the notes, and second, it helps prevent 
some unintended nuisance edits from people who are just intending to 
observe, want to copy/paste from the markdown so they go to the editing 
screen, and end up cutting instead.

RjS

>
> S.
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss