IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04 HTML page

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Tue, 26 April 2011 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1D2E0757 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9RMImCP51z7d for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B3BE0681 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so582488fxm.31 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xAsL/9jQyy2UhjejSOee0/ugL4vOCQ44Tg8dQrMGKqM=; b=qpJCM6OGs33e/59MMIaDVOO+i1F4f3Y7JGlXcaQqtDbpjTf60HXF4LeA0GidFBvrsw ywOfVvhFPJ2Zgw0yCj+3rUi3QYwRL7X+BMBADQRammlPfb/Y5J8oC98RzdE+gcdH8wOB 1s2R427kehE9eFp27DP2duYp10FPtltha0b7Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GQ0oR5CPbQ6kqHRtr2WbXVXd6jbfvXMzKJJVvzdceRFdIzuF2KevyKYuhzzDT7PUJq TqdFloSvPv4DmXnJ6Tbeb4qmH9JgiYhZ5TQ4s6UEDCeaacw7RxNeHbiAgcsjeYeRy4xV nyrTismvE7XMZF0/V92NL4sFSfQ0jxdGX29gU=
Received: by 10.223.17.140 with SMTP id s12mr115743faa.49.1303829966364; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j12sm2030208fax.9.2011.04.26.07.59.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DB6DDF9.1060105@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:00:09 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <4DB59F62.9000701@gmail.com> <198D2050-3684-4087-B49B-4AC3DBD183B7@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <198D2050-3684-4087-B49B-4AC3DBD183B7@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04 HTML page
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:04:26 -0000

Hello all,

I think all who took time to comment my message are losing my point.

I complained about Rfcmarkup tool analyzing the draft's name, not its 
contents when deciding to put pr not to put some RFC as the previous 
version of the draft.  It is logically useful when some draft obsoletes 
another RFC when approved, eg. 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-00 where we have "(RFC 
1150) 00" label.

The draft I pointed to has no any regulations regarding obsoleting 
anything; Rfcmarkup, though, added the label of RFC 5892 being the 
previous version of it.  My complaint was about abnormal handling of the 
draft name/header while finding out Obsoletes/Updates relationships.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email