Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue]

Hi Dan,

Hmm.  Ok.  I'll get the developer to fix it.

Thanks, and best regards,

	Henrik

On 2011-04-26 06:56 Dan Wing said:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tools-discuss-
>> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Levkowetz
>> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 2:24 AM
>> To: Mark Nottingham
>> Cc: IETF TOOLS discussion
>> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the
>> rescue]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new draft submission tool doesn't have this problem. 
> 
> Just now I used the new submission tool for the first time, and it also
> seemed to only need a GET to authorize the actual posting of the I-D.
> 
> -d
> 
> 
>> I'm about to
>> start merging that code to the trunk of the datatracker svn repository
>> in something like 10 minutes from now, and do the first deployment
>> today.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> 	Henrik
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2011-03-23 00:25 Mark Nottingham said the following:
>>> In case this hasn't been seen -- it needs to be fixed (i.e., a GET
>> shouldn't have such side effects).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> *Resent-From: *ietf-http-wg@w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
>>>> *From: *Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr
>> <mailto:bortzmeyer@nic.fr>>
>>>> *Date: *23 March 2011 12:01:23 AM AEDT
>>>> *To: *HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-
>> wg@w3.org>>
>>>> *Subject: **[vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue]*
>>>> *organization: *NIC France
>>>> *archived-at: *<http://www.w3.org/mid/20110322130123.GB12433@nic.fr>
>>>>
>>>> The draft management tool apparently can change the state of a draft
>>>> in response to a simple GET...
>>>>
>>>> Nice violation of the HTTP standard :-)
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org <mailto:vixie@isc.org>>
>>>> *Date: *19 March 2011 2:50:30 AM AEDT
>>>> *To: *dnsext@ietf.org <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
>>>> *Subject: **googlebot to the rescue*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i think the 0x20 draft was going nowhere in any case so cancelling
>> it is fine.
>>>>
>>>> 148.68.249.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
>>>> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com <http://crawl-66-249-68-
>> 148.googlebot.com>.
>>>>
>>>> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com <http://crawl-66-249-68-
>> 148.googlebot.com> has address 66.249.68.148
>>>>
>>>> it's interesting that it can be done by a web crawler, though.
>>>>
>>>> re:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org
>> <mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org>>
>>>> *Date: *18 March 2011 10:36:25 PM AEDT
>>>> *To: *ipr@ietf.org <mailto:ipr@ietf.org>, dagon@cc.gatech.edu
>> <mailto:dagon@cc.gatech.edu>, vixie@isc.org <mailto:vixie@isc.org>
>>>> *Subject: **Submission of draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00 has been
>> Cancelled *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This message is to notify you that submission of an Internet-Draft,
>> draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00, has just been cancelled by a user whose
>> computer has an IP address of 66.249.68.148.
>>>>
>>>> The IETF Secretariat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dnsext mailing list
>>>> dnsext@ietf.org <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> 