Re: [Tools-discuss] Mixed content error on new datatracker stylesheet

[Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]>]

On 2015-04-14 00:26, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 13 April 2015 at 15:00, Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>  Please don't use the list as an issue tracker, there are links in the
>> list footer to the actual issue tracker.
> 
> You mean https://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/newticket ?

Yes.

> Every time I click on a trac link it takes so long to load that I
> think that it's broken.  This one takes more than 15 seconds to get to
> an error page; I thought it was broken after 5.

The problem is not at the server end.  Here I see a load time of about
1.4 s for that page.

>>  ,,:-)  We have different ideas about the degree of ornamentation provided
>> by the PT fonts, but I'll look for some better fallback fonts.
> 
> As I said, this is largely down to taste.  Largely.
> 
> If the primary isn't broken, I don't think that you need to spend time
> on fallback fonts that are hardly ever going to be seen.
> 
>>> Style nit: The summary table for drafts could use a max-width
>>> directive on either the whole table or just the first two columns.
>>
>> Url, please?
> 
> Not sure what you are looking for, but I tend to view this sort of
> page on a fairly wide view:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie/
> 
> On a very wide screen, the table layout tends to give an unnecessary
> amount of space to those first two columns.

Ack, good point.  I'll tweak.

> You can use empty <col> elements [1] and max-width directives [2] if
> you want more precise control and to allow for more content in the
> third column.  Or you could simply cap the width of the table, or the
> page.

I'll probably look at a max-width in ems for the two first columns.

> [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/col
> [2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/max-width
> 
> p.s., the new look is otherwise a lot better.

Ok, good :-)


	Henrik