Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsections in current RFC HTML format

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 15 June 2021 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A693A3E3C for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0meJexlpoh_q for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 925DC3A3E29 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.51]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3922254802F; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 31DB34E778B; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:14:34 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210615211434.GV12022@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <CAKKJt-cYYL8cY2wAPcMfzLNj9vxv4sCYCUfREaAi2LvjE3R2Lw@mail.gmail.com> <603c3bd8-1509-4ea2-ca83-786303d169d9@gmx.de> <20210614203307.GK12022@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <e3e9db8c-3cca-8e75-1627-d20f096c9724@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e3e9db8c-3cca-8e75-1627-d20f096c9724@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/bccvvND-q9LIbIRQmPo4_VELf3U>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsections in current RFC HTML format
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 21:14:54 -0000

Julian,

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 04:17:01AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Am 14.06.2021 um 22:33 schrieb Toerless Eckert:
> > Just don't know these days anymore where/how to submit a bugfix
> > request... whats the "tool" in question here ?
> 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/> (unless datatracker runs
> something else; Robert Sparks would know).

Thanks!

> > > To fix this, the "htmlize" tool would need to be updated.
> > 
> > I think this is not an update, but a fix for a regression bug.
> 
> The tool is not broken; i't doing what it has been doing all the time.
> It's the *input* on what is runs that changed.

Please explain, so that the bug report i would write is as correct
as possible. AFAIK, the input did have section numbers before and past
the new rfc changes. Likewise do the htmlized output have section
heading tags before and after. Just after those section heading tags
have no hotlinks to them in the toc anymore.

Cheers
    Toerless

> > If you look at older html'ized RFCs in comparison, e.g: rfc7866,
> > you will see that the table of content has not only hotlinks to
> > page numbers, but also for the section numbers hotlinks to those
> > section numbers.. And those section number hotlink targets still are
> > in the new rfc renderings (rfc8866), and they even are still
> > hotlinks on the section headings themselves. Just not on the
> > section numbers in th TOC. Sounds to me like it should be a very simple
> > fix.
> > 
> > Looks like collateral damage when removing page numbers, but
> > not justified by any "new rendering rules" i have seen.
> > 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de