Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsections in current RFC HTML format
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 16 June 2021 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E793A1AA5 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oysjXdCAt7Al for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB313A1AA2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2076154806F; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:31:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 1C6D74E779C; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:31:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:31:33 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210616143133.GA12022@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/xZr0IHXDEDAJbPPIuxkSIMlkr7U>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsections in current RFC HTML format
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:31:43 -0000
Thanks, Julian Alas, the answer makes me wonder even more: Where would i find an example of such an IETF draft/RFC rendered with CSS page media attributes ? AFAIK, the older drafts/RFC do not do that, instead they render page breaks explicitly. And the post-reform ones do no contain those media attributes, right ? Even if i had an appropriate attributed html file, i would still not be able to persuade a normal browser to render the html with pagination ?? Cheers Toerless On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 04:14:06AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > Am 15.06.2021 um 03:12 schrieb Toerless Eckert: > > ... > > But then again, afaik, css could by itself not take the current html and paginate it, so it too has its limits. > > ... > > HTML does support pagination. You just need to use the proper CSS paged > media attributes (such as done by rfc2629.xslt=, and use a tools that > takes advantage of them (such as PrinceXml or WeasyPrint). > > Best regards, Julian > > ___________________________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org > This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports. > * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org > * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org > * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org > List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
- [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsection… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Hyperlinks to sections/subsec… Julian Reschke