Re: [Tools-discuss] Request to retain kramdown compiler and author stats

Brian E Carpenter <> Wed, 10 March 2021 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFA33A0D39 for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:09:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MP0d0IUNHv5 for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C573A1723 for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:08:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id w34so11063072pga.8 for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:08:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L0quy6abqFHgrMQR3xLbbyKVDa7yD3XqihY7PJDz7mM=; b=YSMbpscOzky1fExDL87RKbBgEBa3n1fLzMt5rxHymI8/p1tutwJ7oF1D6xiMOB0odi XiJkSBKl1hdClQ/n4LtPDIfAG4W5CKcoZAvKX9TONSY+uHR7601UWqPr1rKhU5IuKvxt Hk66Y2sCF6Y6F2y1pzPdKTXv5QDqmm1w9DPqd8yk+2iLqFsVQNIEogdtv1yNJj6Ev54P sd2F8xfNej2JzXcFRI3Nkp18Q41nor75Ig5ka8lwgS3p/+9CXhfnr1Nc/IMriYOauJ1P IQa7YIBhNEdVJsVxoTzwIR5V8ocV7W86KdEbIEM2yzFRZM9c8xjnp1VJbc+lcNCw2B3u uPmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:cc:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L0quy6abqFHgrMQR3xLbbyKVDa7yD3XqihY7PJDz7mM=; b=htdZsYiY3hvsa+bf3R3wmSovPTg69twTrTmsC9UGo/Hun3q5gtfxo0Rz9XAh/ZO58A SVfGBnlPWlrhb3CkaTQWkXFLm2emb9MtVYXXOQVgu7yDvx6q62gvc/3Y0VEtcjjcUr1t 5KnnTGsVZOOfWwUYRW5jS/YNJfACNlcn3p7GnkKWE26VeqciMOThDmRhdXLEUS2ml68M zVqfm9aoOOmdW2N3L6NZA6DoNT+agMHVQW0YbvGbsEp04TdszhD3sm0BBonWGbVnwQBi 2T/Iq9KvxiQm97hlRVIF/1fA34eRNqK/ln8MmRYeQ8SAXwcfl/8iyBKaDf0X/p+U06qv gvmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GeLgM8UvUf+LY6if+pUW2x0rjfIFuk4mywpno36LSxWjA3Hq2 J7HgDgjNoUokjBYW141OM9bjfzRZYDVnTA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWQCfBceQwN7K6vabN8Whk9BFMQjI43l3h0YOpqoprmZwpjjRzq+zKe8GflvcmXHcY9BB6VA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1d26:: with SMTP id d38mr4291384pgd.385.1615406923389; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:08:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id e22sm337173pgk.56.2021. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:08:43 -0800 (PST)
To: Robert Sparks <>
References: <>
From: Brian E Carpenter <>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <>,
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:08:38 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Request to retain kramdown compiler and author stats
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:09:07 -0000

On 10-Mar-21 23:14, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Two tools that I find particularly useful, and hope are retained are:
> The experimental version of XML2RFC which supports the kramdown compiler. I have found this useful when collaborating with others that are new to kramdown, and also those that are unable to install the kramdown compiler on their work machine due to company policy on third part software.

Assuming you mean, yes, that's an essential tool and if it goes away I'll stop producing drafts. I have no intention of installing all that stuff on my Windows machine, even assuming it's possible.

(Not to mention, but I always use the "experimental" version.)

Note that redirects to I assume therefore that the 30% of draft authors who use a "web service" according to Jay's recent survey actually use

However, Robert told us:

"We will be replacing the online xml2rfc and bibxml services with modern
rewrites of the existing services."

So that's fine, as long as the extras available at the "experimental" URL
are retained.