IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server-01.txt>

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 22 June 2021 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5143A005D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.016
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.016 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5-5itJ_xL7d2 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F273A0045 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 15MF77ic084811 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:07:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1624374428; bh=5ERHwj0bMjrkt8MlbjATt0/iYw3Xpmcx1OwigLdmDyg=; h=To:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=sbsvOhse71hEK2Mwk+TeKFX96LXvvkof5MDMnDto2+ThmoOSYEPd5nr+BYhWeCraQ 03h3ZjpnKYxS0SPReRG+tlzU/DcDS81zFVh0tV8zZIlxgrnUMiJyKmt1zDNucob0lL ef/3yvohaUq+ADoC5c8cLehWxP7fnfLzlxpqeBFw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <162412791356.30471.9582416370793515264@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADyWQ+HDDQLsWTWTXbbwsymXQbNe+S_mhCbWLd-JME+NEOebyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <1a933099-6db8-96b4-6a23-b0a8703bfb56@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:07:01 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+HDDQLsWTWTXbbwsymXQbNe+S_mhCbWLd-JME+NEOebyg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7102BF1C9596AD37E4FE60A6"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/fGnym2I9Vcjefbzu2nor3FnPjFY>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server-01.txt>
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 15:07:23 -0000

Hi Tim -

This one is frustrating - whichever way we state it (old to new, or new 
from old), several people chime in and want it the other way.

The last time we went through this, several IESG members pushed for the 
current form since it puts the most important bit of information (the 
state _now_) first.

We even with through iterations where we split the information onto 
multiple lines, and tried to emphasize (in plain-text) the new state, 
but pushback landed us where we are.

(Note that the new state is bolded on this history page for the document).

We can add quotes, and it would be nice to get other suggestions for how 
to make the message more useful - for instance, would it be helpful for 
the email message to say _who_ changed the state?

RjS


On 6/19/21 1:47 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> I have a silly question.   In these emails, the state change is
>
>     State changed to None from WG Document
>
> Which feels very counter intuitive, and always causes a double take.
> Why does it not read
>
>     State changed from WG Document to None
>
>
> Also, quotes around the state names make things more obvious.
>
> Will gladly file said bug, though it is a nit.
>
> tim
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *IETF Secretariat* <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org 
> <mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>>
> Date: Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 2:38 PM
> Subject: Datatracker State Update Notice: 
> <draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server-01.txt>
> To: <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>>, 
> <draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server@ietf.org 
> <mailto:draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server@ietf.org>>, 
> <warren@kumari.net <mailto:warren@kumari.net>>
>
>
>     State changed to None from WG Document
>
> Datatracker URL: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server/>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email