Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits confused about draft version numbers in the datatracker

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Mon, 23 November 2020 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D2C3A0CB8 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:31:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xLjx1X8eSom7 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:31:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [64.170.98.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B96B03A0CB5 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:31:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h-202-242.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([158.174.202.242]:50104 helo=tannat.local) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1khCsE-0001jz-SF; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:31:23 -0800
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAKKJt-e1+87CqxUfyF8wmxo_DuB5ZAp5n9nL8BW=kZpUsLLNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <BFCA540D-583C-4612-AA4F-99395EE7250B@tzi.org>
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <10e22995-629a-be50-7980-79423ece2e7b@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:31:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BFCA540D-583C-4612-AA4F-99395EE7250B@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WjcWm42Ml1bahI34Xgwg8L8EwNWW9GMCl"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 158.174.202.242
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, cabo@tzi.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ffYi7yhD2v9AOsXBrZBYIG2XpwM>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits confused about draft version numbers in the datatracker
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:31:26 -0000

On 2020-11-20 17:41, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I’m sure Henrik will answer this, but the underlying problem appears to be that idnits is an amazing, organically grown piece of bash, awk, sed, wget, and spit holding all that together.  It is a strong candidate for a rewrite, and I’m not sure now how that will happen.

I expect to have that done before the end of the year.

	Henrik

> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> PS.:
> Trivia question:  What is
> UUOUUUUUUOOUUNUOUUUSUUUUUNUUUUUUUUIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUOUUU
> and why is there only one S in that line?
> 
>> On 2020-11-20, at 16:18, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm getting these warnings from idnits:
>>   -- Unexpected draft version: The latest known version of 
>>      draft-bonaventure-iccrg-schedulers is -00, but you're referring to -01.
>> 
>>   -- Unexpected draft version: The latest known version of 
>>      draft-ietf-quic-datagram is -00, but you're referring to -01.
>> 
>> Oddly, the version numbers are coming from I-D.whatever references with no version numbers, so whatever is adding version numbers added these, but the -01 versions of these drafts do exist in the datatracker. 
>> Best,
>> Spencer
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>> 
>> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
>> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
>> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>> 
>> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
>> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
>> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
>