Re: [Tools-discuss] Closing the chat trial instances

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Wed, 15 September 2021 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <exec-director@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DBB3A0803 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SkHPEpjgrVH8 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfx.ietf.org (ietfx.ietf.org [4.31.198.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0773A07F9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4974972195; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from ietfx.ietf.org ([4.31.198.45]) by localhost (ietfx.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p5PN3qQRfY1d; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FAAE4972180; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <EDE1C87F-2A4B-4C30-8465-542805B4F544@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DE10C38E-6364-4B29-AFFA-7BAA8E16354B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:41:05 +1200
In-Reply-To: <PAXPR07MB7999BA21634049C81018C9E892DB9@PAXPR07MB7999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
To: "Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <julien.maisonneuve@nokia.com>
References: <3683aa58-42e4-c047-5dbc-6f388a986d6a@nostrum.com> <PAXPR07MB7999BA21634049C81018C9E892DB9@PAXPR07MB7999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/qS_iwzIdWCFmlQuNJoBKHYrIFEI>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Closing the chat trial instances
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 23:41:18 -0000

Hi Julien

> On 16/09/2021, at 8:34 AM, Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <julien.maisonneuve@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> I think I was among the people who expressed this was useful, and failed to use it in the last two meetings because I (wrongly ?) relied on Meetecho. I should have tried the new servers/services (which I failed to notice), but was busy with other things.
> I'd like to observe that we can't complain that people are not using Jabber enough, and at the same time remove things that  make Jabber easier to use/configure. Making Jabber harder than it already is will simply decrease usage. We might have a plan to use only Meetecho going forward, but this is a different issue.
> Arguably the instructions at https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/groupchat/ <https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/groupchat/> got much better than in the past, but the notion of IETF having its own server(s) instead of relying on third parties for a somewhat critical service sounded like a sane idea.
> I get the same impression as for the (absence of) debate on the destruction of the FTP service: we cut it because is not used enough, regardless of the inconvenience to people who use it or might use it. Cost cutting in IETF is relatively new, and to me it's not pretty,  I hope it's worth it.

This is not a cost cutting decision and we do not make a cost saving from it.

cheers
Jay

> Best regards,
> Julien.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 6:14 PM
> To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>>
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>; manycouches@ietf.org <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
> Subject: Closing the chat trial instances
> 
> All -
> 
> We are turning off the chat trial instances. This includes:
> 
> xmpp-trial1.ietf.org, matrix-trial1.ief.org, and zulip-trial1.ietf.org
> 
> We've kept them running quite a bit longer than originally planned, and we think we have the information we needed to gather from them.
> 
> Going forward:
> 
> We are in the process of setting up a standing Zulip server and will investigate whether we can integrate that directly with Meetecho as the backend for messaging during Meetecho sessions. We will have XMPP-Zulip bridging in place as long as both services are active. See the service plan at https://github.com/rjsparks/zulip-implementation/blob/main/Service-Plan.md
> 
> We received feedback from a small number of people that providing a Jabber login service was useful, but haven't seen a lot of use of it. 
> We're not currently planning on providing this service going forward. 
> Anyone relying on it should take advantage of other existing services. 
> There is an updated list of alternatives at https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/groupchat/.
> 
> We are not planning to continue provide a Matrix service. Interest was limited, and it presented a more difficult set of operational challenges. See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/AI5hBp1qnLAH-S9T7XhLF-omFS0/
> 
> We have heard and continue to keep in mind the feedback to prefer IETF standards.
> 
> Timing:
> 
> The matrix trial server will be taken down now.
> The xmpp trial server will be taken down in two weeks, giving the few people who had been using it an opportunity to set up something else.
> The zulip trial server will be taken down shortly after the standing server is made available to the community.
> 
> Please take care to send all discussion to tools-discuss@ietf.org
> 
> RjS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org <mailto:Tools-discuss@ietf.org>
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org <mailto:datatracker-project@ietf.org>
> * Report tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org/> bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org <mailto:webmaster@tools.ietf.org>
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org <mailto:ietf-action@ietf.org>
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>
-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org