Re: [Tools-discuss] Interest in title-less sub-sub-sections?

worley@ariadne.com Tue, 13 April 2021 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E583A0DBA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.684
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.684 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FnbPvWR7tz64 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12EE3A0DB8 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.111]) by resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id W8polBcR8fFsMW8uClbWDH; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:35:56 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1618281356; bh=I9MHeK1377V+1pls2766tYD1OYGwmg0Q/Eo2kpmy3gc=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=N+ACgIhSXvp/Z9LmgSvCcHBNDWE/jZc2AVNABGlgVArDp08JR95T+D2wnna+PPIUF ju6Z4ZFzc2NOzCp90kzPWhT2stIUJPlu0xtPgrnCjCnJX++j3Kr8rN7OVHtXpcFYaN 3a3TAwcB0Ce3Sg97XK1RZJSP8NDwY6/hiszEO7PR8M3Ici1wWB75f8v/2UnAfUQXQ2 NjjcGd95dHtkP/3adDHxkNC+16M9JC7VwfBa6OQDjfQYfgrUJqDRFucOrMCtJHIjOi nU68VxxgLu0utHDmjaWWR8PXEF5+MXRuKUkhXUrRuByMLXvRim/g8+XOY/AdHNbQMG 8cXmoyK1Sz6Qg==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id W8u8lYAC63gbqW8u8last3; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:35:54 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 13D1ZnsH003996; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:35:50 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 13D1Zm84003993; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:35:48 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20210412232901.GB9612@localhost> (nico@cryptonector.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:35:47 -0400
Message-ID: <87v98r9dak.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/s48Mlm-IwwfNYYuhdnuFk8plp94>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Interest in title-less sub-sub-sections?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:36:04 -0000

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> writes:
> Consider the x.680 and x.690 series documents.  They typically have many
> tiny sub-sub-sections, with many sub-sub-sections having just one or two
> paragraphs and no title.

> Would we need any changes to the xml2rfc schema or tooling to make this
> style possible for Internet-Drafts and RFCs?

Naively, I'd expect our tools to handle this smoothly if you declared a
section whose title is the null string.  But I haven't tried it.

Dale