Re: [Tools-discuss] Glitch?
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 12 February 2021 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9680B3A0FF4 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:00:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JUL7scwsPSTy for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:00:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5C43A0FFB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 11CM0RdL024922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:00:32 -0500
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:00:27 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210212220027.GP21@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/yhVVnOjqEitdiownV0QUfz3v7lI>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Glitch?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 22:00:42 -0000
Conceptually responding to Brian's https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ZID1X53FJCLTAz3V8SYx79reAVo/ (but I'm not actually subscribed here): I had some similar experiences with https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2, with some accesses telling me that the -28 doesn't exist on the server and others producing the expected content. Which leads me to suspect that there's a server in a bad state in the pool again. But, I am not sure how much time I can afford to spend tracking it down today... -Ben
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Glitch? Benjamin Kaduk