[Tools-implementation] Changing the id-announce template to remove ftp

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 23 October 2020 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD193A12A0 for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X01-pPLtKOX4 for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72ABC3A0A96 for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 09NJ9Eh3009039 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:09:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1603480154; bh=2BEyaeV3sTFQW75KBwo2EFMgIUO+bsRcpb1P1zWz+fk=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=qxbolwtDk7sztV6q18fya1K1MCjJ5T3W3k6rek0k4+qsa1xUfwrzKVuaGUNoyvEvg n9bLWXkMZbSQ7hsIxeHPsBjTzXKtHxbv7Drp0MrzWbJEyU9W/TRniWDcwOang0CZS2 tEJHG1n2SXTVDqsIu2GNuBLBycsX4jTFeLUAi6KA=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: "tools-implementation@ietf.org" <tools-implementation@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <07d3ab8d-360f-8765-30c5-c28a58773b2f@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:09:13 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D81E54A285F339671AF0ECAB"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-implementation/GcOIVZZqjRlqEH09-BoJW9NSliE>
Subject: [Tools-implementation] Changing the id-announce template to remove ftp
X-BeenThere: tools-implementation@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Implementation <tools-implementation.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-implementation/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-implementation@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:09:17 -0000

All (but especially Roman:

I propose that we change the following text, that appears in the 
messages sent to i-d-announce:

> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/  <http://ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>
To:

"Internet-Drafts are also via rsync at rsync.ietf.org::id-archive"

Note that earlier parts of the message already point to how to get 
drafts over https. (See 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i-d-announce/ if you haven't 
looked at i-d-announce recently).

Questions:

1) I think we can just make this change. Do we need to give the IESG a 
heads up?

2) The message points to the archive, and not the repository. There has 
been confusion about the distinction and having things point to the 
archive has helped resolve that. But, fwiw, there is also an rsync point 
for the repository. I don't think we should point there, but does anyone 
disagree?